Live data from Hacker News

Fun facts about Rust's growing popularity

jonathanturner.org

31–40 of 136 posts

Re: Fun facts about Rust's growing popularity

#31
post #4

Best fact: Rust users are apparently called Rustaceans. I did not know this, and have never seen this wonderful term before.

I love my Python but "Pythonista" makes me think I'm selling beverages with funny names for their sizes. I love the demonym for Rust!

> I love my Python but "Pythonista" makes me think I'm selling beverages with funny names for their sizes.

and probably, you are ;)

Re: Fun facts about Rust's growing popularity

#32
post #4

Best fact: Rust users are apparently called Rustaceans. I did not know this, and have never seen this wonderful term before.

I love my Python but "Pythonista" makes me think I'm selling beverages with funny names for their sizes. I love the demonym for Rust!

Pythonista makes me think of a leftist guerilla in a jungle with a beret and a machine gun.

Re: Fun facts about Rust's growing popularity

#34
post #24

However, it is still a new programming language. As well as golang. This has its pros and cons. However, in cases where people say that some language is bad, it means that it simply does not fit their tasks. (sorry, im using google translate)

> However, in cases where people say that some language is bad, it means that it simply does not fit their tasks. I disagree. It is possible for a language to simply be a bad language. Intercal is intentionally so. I will refrain from mentioning unintentionally bad languages in order to avoid a flame war.

If the task is to show everyone their own steepness, then isotheric languages ​​are a good choice. Isn't it? If people did not confuse causes and consequences, it would be more boring to live without sacred wars. It is not correct to call a language bad. But it is correct to call a language not suitable for a specific task.

In fact, the flame wars can also be useful as an advertisement.

Re: Fun facts about Rust's growing popularity

#36

For me, A totally cs newbee, the Rust team has established a great community. I have learned a lot from the e-mentor(contribute to rust or rust lib directly with the guidelines from rust core developers). Now I’m the founder of Rustacean group in my school.

Rustacean, that's the first time of heard of that name. Absolutely fantastic

[deleted]

Re: Fun facts about Rust's growing popularity

#37
post #4

Best fact: Rust users are apparently called Rustaceans. I did not know this, and have never seen this wonderful term before.

Please please please can we stop with the Rustacean/Gopher/etc crap? You don't need a cutesy label to identify that you use a tool.

I enjoy Doctor Who (though it's been getting worse for the last 5 or so years) but I do NOT want to be called a Whovian.

What's the first image that pops into your head when I say "Trekkie"? It's probably not someone with good health and hygiene, is it?

Re: Fun facts about Rust's growing popularity

#38
post #29

Rustaceans? Would recruiting agencies go for that in job ads? "Are you a top rustacean and looking for a challenge in AI and Big Data and want to work in an international team with young and dynamic rustaceans? "

Fun hip dev shops can call them Rustaceans. Stodgy old conservative shops can call them Rust developers. Everybody is understood, everybody wins!

[deleted]

Re: Fun facts about Rust's growing popularity

#39
I'm not on Twitter, and so cannot contact Jonathan Turner (whose website this list of facts is on). On this page, some of the links to the Rust Survey results are broken - they have a prefix of jonathanturner.org and have the actual survey results link within parentheses. [1] They should be corrected to link to the Rust Survey Results. [2]

[1]: http://www.jonathanturner.org/2017/10/(https://blog.rust-lan...

[2]: https://blog.rust-lang.org/2017/09/05/Rust-2017-Survey-Resul...

Re: Fun facts about Rust's growing popularity

#40
Well, a fun fact: there is nothing funny about that list :). It should have been called "Some facts about Rust's growing popularity".

Now, my predicament: I love Rust's type system and tooling, but it's really hard to justify to myself the pain of writing correct Rust code (borrowing, lifetimes, etc.) when I know I can get almost the same effect by using a GC language + immutable messages.

And I don't need that last drop of performance either.

So if you just want a native language with a good type system and a growing ecosystem, where do you go? Still Rust or something else?

Post reply on HN