Live data from Hacker News

Some Heroes

paulgraham.com

61–70 of 109 posts

Re: Some Heroes

#61

Uh, Paul, I assume that you mean Robert Morris the younger? Or his dad? If the younger, I'd think you're well equipped with at least one example where he was less that perfectly right about something.

I mean the younger. And of course his sw has bugs, like anyone's might (though fewer, actually). I'm talking about statements, not choices.

Re: Some Heroes

#62
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My asian religions prof. spent a bunch of years of her life studying the text and she was telling us this. Apparently some people still think it's an esoteric text, but they are in the minority. Unfortunately I don't have any references to back it up, and none of the translations I have sitting in front of me mention it in the forward. And of course it's impossible to find anything via Google only because there are s…

If it isn't too much trouble, I'd be very interested to hear more about that. I'm no scholar, but I find Taoism and the Tao Te Ching fascinating. I would understand it being partly satirical of prevailing thought, whilst being esoteric, but it being a simple satire would be quite amazing to me. Perhaps the esoterism is an artifact of translation/interpolation ;)

I sent her an email, I'll let you know if I get a reply. Failing that this might involve, god forbid, going to a library.

Re: Some Heroes

#63

I was hoping to see Feynman on this list (especially after reading the two qualities that these people had in common). Good read, though.

I almost included him. But I don't understand his work in physics, and it seemed lame to like him for peripheral stuff like his autobiography.

Re: Some Heroes

#64
post #53

Have you read The Nature of Order by Christopher Alexander? I'd very much like to hear your opinions and comments on the book series. And also see, whether he would appear on your next list of heroes. He is definitely on mine.

I read (parts of) A Pattern Language. That seemed like it had a lot of good ideas in it.

Re: Some Heroes

#65
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If it isn't too much trouble, I'd be very interested to hear more about that. I'm no scholar, but I find Taoism and the Tao Te Ching fascinating. I would understand it being partly satirical of prevailing thought, whilst being esoteric, but it being a simple satire would be quite amazing to me. Perhaps the esoterism is an artifact of translation/interpolation ;)

I sent her an email, I'll let you know if I get a reply. Failing that this might involve, god forbid, going to a library.

Cool, thanks for taking the time. Please also convey my thanks to her if you get a reply.

Re: Some Heroes

#66
Winston Churchill would top my list. Definitely passes the PG criteria.

Post WWII: Churchill's Grandson (after running into his office without knocking): "Grand papa, is it true that you're the greatest man in the world?"

Churchill: "Yes, now bugger off."

Re: Some Heroes

#68
No question that PGW was the greatest prose stylist of the 20th century.

Makes sense, from his biography: every morning, 6 days a week, year after year for decades, he would sit down and churn out some 10-20-30 pages of new or edited prose, without fail. Much of it ineffable lightness, some of it a bit clunky, but on the whole an incredible body of work.

Here, in a somewhat explaining-the-joke kind of criticism, is still some pretty rummy stuff about Plum:

http://www.uni-tuebingen.de/uni/nec/leimberg1312.htm

He had a rather sad life, but he was a great artist.

Re: Some Heroes

#69
post #67

Also worth noting that a Calder sculpture is on the cover of a common Algorithms book: http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41WDWECWVCL._SS500_.jp...

Most of the mobiles are literally recursive. I spent a couple days trying to reproduce them once, and one thing you learn when you do that is that each subelement is a complete mobile in itself. In fact I suspect he must often have incorporated "finished" mobiles into larger ones later.

Re: Some Heroes

#70
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you mean he made Nazi propaganda?

No, that would have been Lord Haw Haw and Ezra Pound who made propaganda broadcasts for the fascists. It wasn't as though Wodehouse had shaken hands with Hitler. He merely talked about what his internment was like, and he only made about five broadcasts. Even so, I think he was incredibly naïve of him to do this, given that by 1940, the Germans hadn't simply crossed the line into uncivilized conduct, they had gleeful…

Ah, you're saying he's a Hanoi Jane.

I did not realize that about Ezra Pound. Now I see why people like GK Chesterton and CS Lewis disliked TS Elliot (protege of Pound) so much.

Post reply on HN