Webflow – Interactions 2.0

Post by [deleted] » Wed, Oct 25, 2017, 4:28 AM UTC

iamdustan wrote: post #17

gfodor wrote: post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I usually don't post seemingly pedantic comments on HN, but I have to call you out here. You guys are blocking users from using your application in Firefox because of scrollbar colors? That seems like a terrible choice given it is probably alienating a good chunk of potential users.

What would HN be without pedanticism? ‍️¯\_(ツ)_/¯ We’re also more than just “guys”.

Post by gfodor » Wed, Oct 25, 2017, 4:31 AM UTC

iamdustan wrote: post #17

gfodor wrote: post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I usually don't post seemingly pedantic comments on HN, but I have to call you out here. You guys are blocking users from using your application in Firefox because of scrollbar colors? That seems like a terrible choice given it is probably alienating a good chunk of potential users.

What would HN be without pedanticism? ‍️¯\_(ツ)_/¯ We’re also more than just “guys”.

Post by brryant » Wed, Oct 25, 2017, 12:33 PM UTC

biocomputation wrote: post #29

brryant wrote: post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hey there, Webflow CTO here. We take performance seriously here so I'm secretly in glee to see users notice this. It's a similar stack we use for Webflow hosting: https://webflow.com/hosting A few things on this page that make this site fast: - Responsive Images created for you as your build your site ( https://webflow.com/feature/responsive-images ) - HTTP2 wherever possible - Fastly for initial HTML document for su…

Neat tool - and a lot of hard, careful work no doubt. In one of your articles, you say that your product isn't a 'grandma web site builder' or something to that effect. Any chance you could, in the future, perhaps use different language? Maybe something a little less derogatory to older folks? I totally get that it wasn't your intent!