Live data from Hacker News

Why ProtonMail is more secure than Gmail

protonmail.com

261–270 of 314 posts

Re: Why ProtonMail is more secure than Gmail

#261
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

More importantly they give any government agency free access without any warrant to fulltext search any customer. US law interpretation of IMAP. Only with a POP3 service you are safe.

Source?

all of the news about how the 3-letter agencies operate from the last decade

Re: Why ProtonMail is more secure than Gmail

#262
post #135

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Uncle Sam can root your machine. If Uncle Sam is the threat vector you're better off using pen and paper.

Uncle Sam can’t dragnet root everyone’s machine, but they can (and do) dragnet surveil large email providers not focused on security. “The government can hack anyone, just give up” is a dumb objection if you view security from an economic perspective. Defenders have a huge advantage over attackers that we aren’t sufficiently taking advantage of yet.

Huge advantage? Can you elaborate?

Re: Why ProtonMail is more secure than Gmail

#265
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

you might want to check yahoo mail then. I work for them (oath now). and at some point all employers were forced to dogfood it. the UI took a while to get used, but now I miss in app tabs witg several emails (in Gmail I need browser tabs). ...Long story short: after yahoo was acquired we moved to gmail. you cannot belive how much more spam shows up on my imbox that I had never seens before. not to mention yahoo took…

Wait, Yahoo uses Google Mail internally? o_o

yep, after verizon. with a 3rd party for extra spam filtering.

Re: Why ProtonMail is more secure than Gmail

#266
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

you might want to check yahoo mail then. I work for them (oath now). and at some point all employers were forced to dogfood it. the UI took a while to get used, but now I miss in app tabs witg several emails (in Gmail I need browser tabs). ...Long story short: after yahoo was acquired we moved to gmail. you cannot belive how much more spam shows up on my imbox that I had never seens before. not to mention yahoo took…

I would like to respectfully disagree about spam on Yahoo mail. I have so much spam there, you won't believe. And what irks me the most is that a lot of it is easy spam: viagra, etc.

well, you have one anecdotal data point with two different email addresses, while I was providing a fact on 10,000 users with the same email addresses on both platforms.

my guess, you probably had the y email much longer than the g one (yahoo mail is a decade older) and you posted that email in too many geocities guestboards. do the same with your g address and report back in 10 years :)

Re: Why ProtonMail is more secure than Gmail

#267

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If Protonmail servers are hacked, it's game over (that could be mitigated by having verified client code, but at this time there's the web client that is served dynamically, and the mobile clients are closed source...). That is where Protonmail are at a huge disadvantage unless they have a really really good security team. Server hacking is done a dime a dozen nowadays.

That's a threat that Gmail faces as well though.

With a security budget several orders of more, yes.

Re: Why ProtonMail is more secure than Gmail

#268
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They do for their new Advanced Protection Program[1]. The regular Gmail service is not really marketed to the security concious users. It's like comparing Android to Qubes OS. Not really fair. For what they are, Google products are surprisingly secure. [1] https://landing.google.com/advancedprotection/

> "Google products are surprisingly secure" For one their products are not "secured" from Google seeing your private data...

Protonmail has the ability to get all your messages plaintext. Because they have to SEND your email to the recipient. Unless you encrypt the plaintext, when you jump domains and email someone outside of protonmail, they can get text

Re: Why ProtonMail is more secure than Gmail

#269
post #241

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In other words, about as good as gmail but with better control over false positives.

For me, Gmail solves the spam problem. I don't even remember the last time I've had a false positive or a piece of spam that made it to my inbox. My entire family uses Gmail (our domain is hosted via Google Apps) and as far as I know, it's been very close to perfect for all of us.

Well, do you really check your spam folder all the time? There might be false positives that you miss.

Re: Why ProtonMail is more secure than Gmail

#270
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Gmail isn't floating around any brochures on security though - it's pitch to the majority of its users is "It's Google and Mail and where most people have their emails. You don't want to be that one weirdo at @yahoo.com do you?" and that just about does it. ProtonMail is trying to recruit users with the brochure. That said, even though the argument is a bit flawed here, I think most attracted by it would still prefer…

Do you really believe people use gmail because of its brand? I don't know about any security brochure, but I know I can setup 2FA to use push notifications (not an insecure SMS number), and can check where all of my logins are from, and have "suspicious" logins blocked automatically, etc, etc. I can also create single-use passwords for insecure devices (such as a youtube password just for my apple TV). Not to mention…

Many people think google is professional. My AP lit teacher said so. I thought it was stupid at the time, but in terms of professional capability, google offers the most services (at the cost of surveillance and advertising). And many other people would question using something like hotmail or yahoo because it's different.
Post reply on HN