21–30 of 138 posts
I think this is a great turning point for Facebook and might even bring Facebook back on the map SOCIAL media wise. Since almost all people I know barely use Facebook anymore for communication, because you just don’t see any posts by your friends no more.
Big difference between what the article says: "The idea behind the Explore Feed is to help Facebook users discover more content across the social network, beyond posts from friends and Pages you already follow. Instead, this feed surfaces recommended content it thinks you might find interesting." And what the author of the Medium post says: "All posts by pages are moved from News Feed to Explore Feed. In main News Fe…
> If it's reduced back down into what it was in 2010, it's going to outrage a lot of older people who use it for more than a friend feed. And some people (like me) would be really happy. For me at least, the facebook feed at this point is just pure SPAM and garbage.
Big difference between what the article says: "The idea behind the Explore Feed is to help Facebook users discover more content across the social network, beyond posts from friends and Pages you already follow. Instead, this feed surfaces recommended content it thinks you might find interesting." And what the author of the Medium post says: "All posts by pages are moved from News Feed to Explore Feed. In main News Fe…
http://zdnet2.cbsistatic.com/hub/i/2017/03/31/05706b1f-125b-...
Big difference between what the article says: "The idea behind the Explore Feed is to help Facebook users discover more content across the social network, beyond posts from friends and Pages you already follow. Instead, this feed surfaces recommended content it thinks you might find interesting." And what the author of the Medium post says: "All posts by pages are moved from News Feed to Explore Feed. In main News Fe…
The "News Feed" => "Explore Feed" thing reminds me of this image, someone on Twitter created it when Twitter starting muddling around with their feed: http://zdnet2.cbsistatic.com/hub/i/2017/03/31/05706b1f-125b-...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yet they over time created this crucial need of local/small business to have a Facebook page if they want to engage with potential customers and such, but now they change this “contract”.
The truly evil thing here is that page admins are prompted relentlessly by Facebook to purchase "likes", which Facebook makes more and more worthless.
The annoying thing here, as a Facebook user, is that if I've liked the "Cute Puppies" page it's because I want to see their cute puppies. To then strip them entirely out of my Facebook feed unless they hand Facebook some cash feels like a step back in my usage of Facebook.
The best part about Twitter is the simple timeline. Twitter doesn’t care about what the account represents, so all accounts have the same priority. Yes, Twitter has started to mess with its timeline, but that’s besides the point. Facebook’s noise problem is one that they themselves created. Countless of times I found myself subscribed to some page only because I liked one of their posts. Which is bullshit, because in…
Do groups count in this category, or are groups a third category?
I don't think I follow any "pages" such as those created by companies or artists (apart from personal accounts).
If "pages" were basically fb's equivalent of corporate accounts, why would you want to follow them? Isn't that like signing up for commercials in your feed?
