Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Why hasn’t Google killed Google Plus?

news.ycombinator.com

41–50 of 51 posts

Re: Ask HN: Why hasn’t Google killed Google Plus?

#41
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's still a sore spot. It was like a knife in the ribs. A really long knife. Serrated. And floppy. Spinning, too. Laced with Carolina Reaper sauce.

With the death of Google Reader, I completely stopped reading feeds. It killed a part of the internet for me.

Feedly is better than Google Reader ever was these days. The team there is also super responsive to issues.

Re: Ask HN: Why hasn’t Google killed Google Plus?

#42
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's still a sore spot. It was like a knife in the ribs. A really long knife. Serrated. And floppy. Spinning, too. Laced with Carolina Reaper sauce.

With the death of Google Reader, I completely stopped reading feeds. It killed a part of the internet for me.

Same here, I've tried feedly and a variety of local clients but it just didn't have the same charm. Now I just pop open HN, my automatic Google Now feed, and reddit occasionally.

Re: Ask HN: Why hasn’t Google killed Google Plus?

#43
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's still a sore spot. It was like a knife in the ribs. A really long knife. Serrated. And floppy. Spinning, too. Laced with Carolina Reaper sauce.

With the death of Google Reader, I completely stopped reading feeds. It killed a part of the internet for me.

NewsBlur is closest replacement I could find, been using it since Reader died. I like it.

Re: Ask HN: Why hasn’t Google killed Google Plus?

#47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Many people, my wife included, use it regularly. That's all I needed to hear. Google+ is the most legit social networking site now.

If you haven't heard about this person's wife using Google+ it's a little bit of anecdotical evidence that it's doing its job of supporting communities rather than generically connecting people (like Facebook). The user interface remains outstandingly bad, but I've never seen clickbait links or scammers on Google+.

Some elements seem unnecessarily complex, but I actually like Google+'s UI. No one I know uses it so therefore I don't either, but I do like the look of it.

Re: Ask HN: Why hasn’t Google killed Google Plus?

#48
I'm a regular Google+ user and I find it incredibly valuable. The fact that there are fewer people on there is actually an asset - the people that do use it do so because they have some topic they're interested in that they're discussing with other interested parties. There's a lot of mathematicians, scientists, and authors. In general, the average g+ user is much more knowledgeable than on any other site.

Also, the actual features are super valuable. You can create collections with varying levels of privacy for your posts. I use some private collections to take notes, and post more well thought out content in the public versions of those collections. The collections help me organize my thoughts, and I can see different ideas emerging over time. I have a collection to talk about software engineering practices, for example.

Also, being able to create private communities is nice. My wife and I have a private community where we share things about our daughter - photos, things we want to remember, things she's learning.

Overall, g+ has enriched my life.

Re: Ask HN: Why hasn’t Google killed Google Plus?

#49

Same reason everyone not Facebook hasn't yet given up and declared defeat? This isn't Highlander: there can be more than one. Google+ has plenty of active communities of people who choose not to use Facebook. Nothing wrong with that.

While I don't use G+ for anything, a good friend tells me that's where the role-playing game community is centered. He writes blog posts about an RPG he's developing, then links to them from his G+ account so that people with an interest will see them. So that's one active community, at least.

It's also where the Ingress community is.

Re: Ask HN: Why hasn’t Google killed Google Plus?

#50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

With the death of Google Reader, I completely stopped reading feeds. It killed a part of the internet for me.

Feedly is better than Google Reader ever was these days. The team there is also super responsive to issues.

I agree that Feedly is great (using it right now to reply).

The support is however abysmal. I tried to raise two bugs for a year but nobody cared to reply. They are at par with JetBrains.

In contrast, I did not have any hopes with Chrome but it ended up being worked upon.

Post reply on HN