Becoming Foolish
hmemcpy.com
Becoming Foolish
1–10 of 35 posts
Re: Becoming Foolish
#2[deleted]
Re: Becoming Foolish
#3This item has 6 points and is number #6 on Hackernews' homepage. The fuck?
Re: Becoming Foolish
#4This item has 6 points and is number #6 on Hackernews' homepage. The fuck?
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html see "How are stories ranked?"
Re: Becoming Foolish
#5There has to be a better way of stopping people from upvoting with alt accounts, or emailing a listserve asking for upvotes.
One way would be to make sure the article generates good discussion. There are no comments on this article other than complaints that it's on the front page...
Re: Becoming Foolish
#6Don't learn languages - learn pure paradigms. I can write C# three different ways - imperative procedural, functional, imperative OOP.
Re: Becoming Foolish
#7There has to be a better way of stopping people from upvoting with alt accounts, or emailing a listserve asking for upvotes. One way would be to make sure the article generates good discussion. There are no comments on this article other than complaints that it's on the front page...
(Genuine Question)
Is an article only considered good if it generates a large discussion?
What about if people read it, found it thought provoking, but didn't have anything to add, to discuss?
Re: Becoming Foolish
#8There has to be a better way of stopping people from upvoting with alt accounts, or emailing a listserve asking for upvotes. One way would be to make sure the article generates good discussion. There are no comments on this article other than complaints that it's on the front page...
(Genuine Question) Is an article only considered good if it generates a large discussion? What about if people read it, found it thought provoking, but didn't have anything to add, to discuss?
I agree. I thought this was a great article and don't have much to add. Is there any evidence there is vote rigging in action here.
Re: Becoming Foolish
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
(Genuine Question) Is an article only considered good if it generates a large discussion? What about if people read it, found it thought provoking, but didn't have anything to add, to discuss?
I agree. I thought this was a great article and don't have much to add. Is there any evidence there is vote rigging in action here.
Same. I upvote all the time but rarely comment.
Re: Becoming Foolish
#10Don't learn languages - learn pure paradigms. I can write C# three different ways - imperative procedural, functional, imperative OOP.
[deleted]