For what it's worth, the name is obviously a pun and a small wink to the Graal VM [1]. Not sure there's any intention to reference TempleOS's HolyC. [1] https://github.com/graalvm/
Hate to be a downer but I don't get the pun at all.
HolyJit: A New Hope
51–60 of 219 posts
Re: HolyJit: A New Hope
#52I'm not sure as to what is fundamentally different about this JIT-compiler (except for the awesome name of course) Is it basically just a Rust rewrite which also tries to reduce the complexity of their current just-in-time compiler? Edit: By calling it "just" a Rust rewrite, I'm not implying that's a simple undertaking, even moreso considering the complexity of modern JS engines.
Basically, instead of manually writing assembly fragments, they want to reuse annotated interpreter code, thus ensuring both correctness and safety for JIT-generated code, while reducing the redundancy. The rustc compiler is used to generate assembly fragments for the JIT, directly out of the interpreter code. It seems like a worthwhile endeavor.
Re: HolyJit: A New Hope
#53Jokes aside, I love this kind of work from the Mozilla team. This and the bits going into Quantum are really amazing pieces of software engineering in my opinion.
Re: HolyJit: A New Hope
#54For what it's worth, the name is obviously a pun and a small wink to the Graal VM [1]. Not sure there's any intention to reference TempleOS's HolyC. [1] https://github.com/graalvm/
He has a small following on Reddit and users post updates of his whereabouts from time to time. He still sporadically streams live video to the TempleOS site. Last broadcast was from an internet cafe.
Re: HolyJit: A New Hope
#55Re: HolyJit: A New Hope
#56For what it's worth, the name is obviously a pun and a small wink to the Graal VM [1]. Not sure there's any intention to reference TempleOS's HolyC. [1] https://github.com/graalvm/
It might be that, but not "obviously". In fact it could also be totally unrelated.
One can imagine devs naming something "Holy" without wanting to reference TempleOS, the Graal VM etc.
Religious inspired references are perfectly common in themselves.
Re: HolyJit: A New Hope
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, once you convince everyone to drop the thing we have that works and implement the thing we don't have that doesn't work. In short: you complain as though it were an easy change to make.
He/she is right though, just wait when WebAssembly gets more mature. I bet all those plugins will be back.
Re: HolyJit: A New Hope
#58For what it's worth, the name is obviously a pun and a small wink to the Graal VM [1]. Not sure there's any intention to reference TempleOS's HolyC. [1] https://github.com/graalvm/
Re: HolyJit: A New Hope
#59For what it's worth, the name is obviously a pun and a small wink to the Graal VM [1]. Not sure there's any intention to reference TempleOS's HolyC. [1] https://github.com/graalvm/
> For what it's worth, the name is obviously a pun and a small wink to the Graal VM It might be that, but not "obviously". In fact it could also be totally unrelated. One can imagine devs naming something "Holy" without wanting to reference TempleOS, the Graal VM etc. Religious inspired references are perfectly common in themselves.
"The name is a reference to another project named GraalVM, except that the goal of this project is not to make a VM, but only to make a JIT as a library."
Re: HolyJit: A New Hope
#60For what it's worth, the name is obviously a pun and a small wink to the Graal VM [1]. Not sure there's any intention to reference TempleOS's HolyC. [1] https://github.com/graalvm/
Last I heard Terry Davis got kicked out of his parent's house and is now living out of his car. Something about an upcoming court case he's involved in as well. He has a small following on Reddit and users post updates of his whereabouts from time to time. He still sporadically streams live video to the TempleOS site. Last broadcast was from an internet cafe.