Live data from Hacker News

MongoDB shares jump more than 30% in $192M IPO

cnbc.com

1–10 of 425 posts

Re: MongoDB shares jump more than 30% in $192M IPO

#2
Is it me..or does Mongo not seem as relevent and 'hip' as it once was... I mean I feel postgres is much more solid, and you can combine some of the aspects of document store via the json data types they added... of course I'm not really a DBA and don't have a lot of Mongo experience ... but personally I feel rdbms make more sense for growth/scaling..

Re: MongoDB shares jump more than 30% in $192M IPO

#3

Is it me..or does Mongo not seem as relevent and 'hip' as it once was... I mean I feel postgres is much more solid, and you can combine some of the aspects of document store via the json data types they added... of course I'm not really a DBA and don't have a lot of Mongo experience ... but personally I feel rdbms make more sense for growth/scaling..

That's precisely why they IPO'd. Private investors needed an exit while they shift their money to Docker Inc for the next tech hype train.

https://www.hntrends.com/2017/september.html?compare1=Mongod...

Re: MongoDB shares jump more than 30% in $192M IPO

#6

Is it me..or does Mongo not seem as relevent and 'hip' as it once was... I mean I feel postgres is much more solid, and you can combine some of the aspects of document store via the json data types they added... of course I'm not really a DBA and don't have a lot of Mongo experience ... but personally I feel rdbms make more sense for growth/scaling..

To be fair, Mongo is better than it's ever been. They even got through Jepsen just fine after wiredtiger.

That said, it's pretty hard to make sense of when you would want non-relational dbms these days, especially in an era where you can get 100core systems in AWS/GCP. Write-scaling is still a pretty obvious reason, though things like Citus might help here.

Re: MongoDB shares jump more than 30% in $192M IPO

#7

Is it me..or does Mongo not seem as relevent and 'hip' as it once was... I mean I feel postgres is much more solid, and you can combine some of the aspects of document store via the json data types they added... of course I'm not really a DBA and don't have a lot of Mongo experience ... but personally I feel rdbms make more sense for growth/scaling..

I sorta feel the same way - but then I think about the 800(?) employees they have and their combined skillset in database administration, internals, research, philosophy and I'm left feeling like there has got to be a very strong technical and business use case that I just don't see. Like I would imagine that if I were locked in a room with their Sr. product people and devs, they could easily convince most people of mongodb. I would pay money to see a debate style db-off between Postgres' core devs, and representatives from Mongodb.
Post reply on HN