A Closer Look at the $13B Premium Eyewear Market
businessoffashion.com
A Closer Look at the $13B Premium Eyewear Market
1–10 of 138 posts
Re: A Closer Look at the $13B Premium Eyewear Market
#2Re: A Closer Look at the $13B Premium Eyewear Market
#3Europeans seem to wear glasses at a much higher rate than Americans. Is there is structural reason for the preference of glasses over contacts?
Re: A Closer Look at the $13B Premium Eyewear Market
#4Europeans seem to wear glasses at a much higher rate than Americans. Is there is structural reason for the preference of glasses over contacts?
Might be cultural reasons. Europe tends to be more pro-intellectual, and glasses are highly associated with the intellectual.
Without condemning anyone, the US has a very stratified class system. Those lower on the socio-economic ladder may not invest in vision care, which is a more complicated and expensive proposition in the US than it is in Europe. Among those that do, the US population probably has more disposable income than their European counterparts.
I love Europe, but saying that Americans hate nerds and Europeans are intellectual is just lazy. Many European policies, especially in terms of monetary policy and immigration policy, are not what I would call thoughtful or logical.
Re: A Closer Look at the $13B Premium Eyewear Market
#5Re: A Closer Look at the $13B Premium Eyewear Market
#6Edit: spelling
Re: A Closer Look at the $13B Premium Eyewear Market
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
Might be cultural reasons. Europe tends to be more pro-intellectual, and glasses are highly associated with the intellectual.
Orrr among people who wear vision correction, the US population has a higher median income that can afford contact lenses. Without condemning anyone, the US has a very stratified class system. Those lower on the socio-economic ladder may not invest in vision care, which is a more complicated and expensive proposition in the US than it is in Europe. Among those that do, the US population probably has more disposable i…
Re: A Closer Look at the $13B Premium Eyewear Market
#8Luxottica retail brands: http://www.luxottica.com/en/retail-brands
Luxottica eyewear brands: http://www.luxottica.com/en/eyewear-brands
Luxottica vision insurance: http://www.luxottica.com/en/node/6336
See 60 Minutes story on Luxottica: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gDdq2rIqAlM
Re: A Closer Look at the $13B Premium Eyewear Market
#9Re: A Closer Look at the $13B Premium Eyewear Market
#10The reason glasses cost so much is because one company owns: (1) nearly all brand name frames including Ray-Ban, Oakley, Prada eyewear, Armani eyewear and so on, (2) nearly all retail stores such as LensCrafters, Pearle Vision, Sears Optical and Target Optical and (3) EyeMed, one of the largest vision insurance companies. Luxottica retail brands: http://www.luxottica.com/en/retail-brands Luxottica eyewear brands: htt…
Edit: Ok, here we go downvoter. From memory: I could get a Perry Ellis frame out of the Frames catalog for about $10. Sola would sell me bifocal CR-39 lenses for ~$3.50/pair. A bottle of dye to tint lenses was about $4.00 and would last a week. A bottle of UV solution was $12 and it too would last a week. We'd sell the Frames for $150, the lenses for $125 and $10 a pop for tint and UV. This was early 90's before Luxottica bought everyone. I know I was in the business and, well, stayed in the business even after they bought the company I worked for. I'm not defending Luxottica. I don't like them, but it paid for my education and I have a pension coming in 10 years or so. Anyway, it was expensive _before_ them. My point stands. The one hour shops all had more to do with the prices going up than Luxottica did at that time.