I used and loved Nylas Mail (aka N1), so I'm going to be taking a close look at this. For the record, my needs in a mail client are: GUI, very clean UI, pretty themes, good search, works with gmail, ideally supports snoozing emails (a key feature if you like to pursue Inbox Zero), if at all possible should be a desktop app for OS X and Windows, and I wouldn't be adverse to open notifications and such. Also, I'm expli…
Mailspring: A fork of Nylas Mail by one of the original authors
11–20 of 91 posts
Re: Mailspring: A fork of Nylas Mail by one of the original authors
#12Re: Mailspring: A fork of Nylas Mail by one of the original authors
#13I used and loved Nylas Mail (aka N1), so I'm going to be taking a close look at this. For the record, my needs in a mail client are: GUI, very clean UI, pretty themes, good search, works with gmail, ideally supports snoozing emails (a key feature if you like to pursue Inbox Zero), if at all possible should be a desktop app for OS X and Windows, and I wouldn't be adverse to open notifications and such. Also, I'm expli…
Can you tell me what is wrong with gmail? It seems to check all your boxes.
Google Inbox is a better UI, but goes too far the other way towards wasting too much space. It's also missing some key features, and is still not a desktop client.
Also, neither one of them supports showing emails from multiple gmail accounts in a single inbox (unless you just blindly forward emails from one to the other, which you can do, but I'd rather avoid).
I recognize I'm being very picky here; mostly what I just want is Dropbox's Mailbox app, but they killed that off long ago, much to my eternal disappointment.
Re: Mailspring: A fork of Nylas Mail by one of the original authors
#14I used and loved Nylas Mail (aka N1), so I'm going to be taking a close look at this. For the record, my needs in a mail client are: GUI, very clean UI, pretty themes, good search, works with gmail, ideally supports snoozing emails (a key feature if you like to pursue Inbox Zero), if at all possible should be a desktop app for OS X and Windows, and I wouldn't be adverse to open notifications and such. Also, I'm expli…
> I'm explicitly fine with their being an extra server in the mix; this is required for snoozing emails to work properly Out of interest, why would this be so? On the face of it a single client can keep its own snoozing metadata and use a helper process to do the work. I suppose if you want to ensure snoozing works across clients, you'd need a slightly clumsy workaround for the metadata (eg. encoded somewhere in the…
Re: Mailspring: A fork of Nylas Mail by one of the original authors
#15I like the UI and some features of Nylas, and thus Mailspring. But the fact I need a third party server worry me. I would love an open source native mail client that do all the syncing locally
Re: Mailspring: A fork of Nylas Mail by one of the original authors
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I'm explicitly fine with their being an extra server in the mix; this is required for snoozing emails to work properly Out of interest, why would this be so? On the face of it a single client can keep its own snoozing metadata and use a helper process to do the work. I suppose if you want to ensure snoozing works across clients, you'd need a slightly clumsy workaround for the metadata (eg. encoded somewhere in the…
I'm really not sure to be honest. It does seem like you could do something weird with IMAP to make it work, but every implementation I know of uses a server.
Re: Mailspring: A fork of Nylas Mail by one of the original authors
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I'm explicitly fine with their being an extra server in the mix; this is required for snoozing emails to work properly Out of interest, why would this be so? On the face of it a single client can keep its own snoozing metadata and use a helper process to do the work. I suppose if you want to ensure snoozing works across clients, you'd need a slightly clumsy workaround for the metadata (eg. encoded somewhere in the…
I'm really not sure to be honest. It does seem like you could do something weird with IMAP to make it work, but every implementation I know of uses a server.
Re: Mailspring: A fork of Nylas Mail by one of the original authors
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm really not sure to be honest. It does seem like you could do something weird with IMAP to make it work, but every implementation I know of uses a server.
Why is it regarded as weird to use IMAP for this? It seems like an obvious use for IMAP.
Re: Mailspring: A fork of Nylas Mail by one of the original authors
#19Re: Mailspring: A fork of Nylas Mail by one of the original authors
#20But if you send an invalid download request like ".../download?platform=foo" then you get back a handy JSON error string indicating that the Linux downloads are:
https://updates.getmailspring.com/download?platform=linuxDeb and https://updates.getmailspring.com/download?platform=linuxRpm
Maybe Ben or someone will see this and comment why the links aren't there, since it looks like the github repo has issues filed for this.