Live data from Hacker News

Rescuing Nokia? A former exec has a radical plan

theregister.co.uk

41–50 of 55 posts

Re: Rescuing Nokia? A former exec has a radical plan

#41
post #37
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I love the durability of Nokia phones. They're tools rather than some kind of precious object.

Their low-end consumer phones, maybe. In my experience their smartphones have been as poorly-built as everybody else's. My Nokia smartphones were the only phones I've owned that didn't still look good after two years, with discoloured plastic and loose parts.

My last Nokia ran Symbian. Lasted for years and years. Sure the case was pretty scratched up, but I didn't have to replace it every time I dropped it on the ground.

Re: Rescuing Nokia? A former exec has a radical plan

#42
I may be the only one, but I would gladly pay $50 for a Nokia 3210 - at the very least as a party or back-up phone. I think that it still holds up well today, and if not, they could just improve the hardware and add a camera and colour screen: "3210S"? I have actually tried finding and ordering a mint 3210 on eBay without any luck.

I don't see anyone beating Apple in the app phone market - maybe Google themselves might fare adequately with a new Nexus and some Android tweaks. I am not an Android person myself, but I am sure that others are.

Re: Rescuing Nokia? A former exec has a radical plan

#43

I (and also a lot of people) think they ought to ship Android phones, How bad could be for them that option? my limited vision says it is an excellent choice.

This reminds me of the way that, in the late 90s, everyone was calling for Apple to dump Mac OS, switch to commodity hardware, spin off the OS division, or whatever, things that in retrospect would have meant Apple never got to where it is today. I suspect that Android would be a local maximum in Nokia's solution space, missing out on huge wins they could make if they took some radical steps as this article suggests.

Re: Rescuing Nokia? A former exec has a radical plan

#44

From the article. "Essentially, Nokia has forgotten how to bring innovative products to market. This is despite a rich R&D base, which has pioneered many of the innovations competitors now feature. Instead, a risk-averse bureaucracy has grown up that stifles innovation – it makes progress slow or non-existent." An old and familiar story. "his diagnosis may be familiar, but the proposals quite radical. ... a bloodbath…

While I worked at Yahoo someone did an analysis of the employee database and calculated the average number of reportees for each "manager". The numbers came close to suggesting Yahoo was organized as a binary tree.

Re: Rescuing Nokia? A former exec has a radical plan

#45

I (and also a lot of people) think they ought to ship Android phones, How bad could be for them that option? my limited vision says it is an excellent choice.

Shipping Android isn't an option for Nokia. They will be late to the party to the tune of two years. It's not a politics thing - they have a huge market and mindshare in smartphones. Actively commoditizing smartphones on the Android platform would be suicide. If you like Macs you don't get a new computer, you get a new Mac. If you like Windows/Linux, you just get a new computer. It might be a Dell, a HP or a ThinkPad…

Symbian S60 and Symbian 3rd gen is the same (or actually 3rd gen is subset of S60); Maemo and MeeGo is the same. That makes it down to two platfoms.

They actually have also S40, but that is for feature phones. I believe that they want to get rid of S40, put S60 on low end and MeeGo on high end phones.

Re: Rescuing Nokia? A former exec has a radical plan

#46
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Shipping Android phones would be probably a smart move for Nokia but I don't think the company wants to be bound to Google that much. Instead of insisting on Symbian, they should have worked on developing a proper Linux-based OS. Maybe is not relevant, but Linus Torvalds is Finnish and the country, even if rather small, has the brain power to do that. Maybe now is too late and probably the Android move would be the s…

Right now, the 400lb pound gorilla for all phone companies is Apple. Moving to Android is the best thing for Nokia to do because of the availability of applications, interests, etc. To build something to compete from the ground-up would be insane. Nokia should take a page out of the HTC playbook: Implement Android but have it's own flavor through TouchFlo.

Not really, Apple, while it is the loud one, does not have the volume shipped Nokia has.

Remember, there are much more folks who want phone than those who want pocket computer or toy.

Re: Rescuing Nokia? A former exec has a radical plan

#47
post #38
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This seems to be a good heuristic , find out the ratio of the doers versus middle-managers , the higher this number is the better it is. One other company that exhibits this nimbleness ala Apple despite its size is Goldman Sachs. From personal experience , among other things , GS gets this ratio right where it counts.

How about various militaries?

at least the bottom levels of regular military hierarchies are usually quite well defined in terms of structure, titles and numbers. which is sort of the whole point: people know what is expected of them.

how much similarity there is between various countries I don't know, but it would surprised me if at least western military hierarchies are very different. (similarity between nations makes cooperation easier, but where there are differences there usually exist mappings. for instance between different systems of rank)

Re: Rescuing Nokia? A former exec has a radical plan

#48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Shipping Android isn't an option for Nokia. They will be late to the party to the tune of two years. It's not a politics thing - they have a huge market and mindshare in smartphones. Actively commoditizing smartphones on the Android platform would be suicide. If you like Macs you don't get a new computer, you get a new Mac. If you like Windows/Linux, you just get a new computer. It might be a Dell, a HP or a ThinkPad…

Symbian S60 and Symbian 3rd gen is the same (or actually 3rd gen is subset of S60); Maemo and MeeGo is the same. That makes it down to two platfoms. They actually have also S40, but that is for feature phones. I believe that they want to get rid of S40, put S60 on low end and MeeGo on high end phones.

OK, I've got my facts backwards... Good for them on Maemo/MeeGo, I though they'd completely lost it there.

But Symbian 3rd gen (aka. Symbian^3) is indeed different from S60 (which has 4 editions: 1, 2, 3 and 5), with 5th edition becoming Symbian^1. As a matter of fact, Symbian^4 (in which the current UI is replaced by the Nokia Qt SDK) is positioned for a 2011 launch according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbian_platform

It's the Qt SDK that I counted as a new platform in itself.

Long story short: Focus. Nokia can't have two promising and incompatible smartphone platforms.

Re: Rescuing Nokia? A former exec has a radical plan

#49
post #2

I have worked in Nokia as consultant for almost a year and I have always wondered how Nokia became Nokia, given they way they managed software development internally. Several consultancy companies were working on the same project - a communication nightmare and developers with little or no experience were brought on board. But, as the book suggests, the main issue was coming from the Nokia managers involved in the pr…

This is what happens when a field matures; companies transition to "managing assets" and source commoditized products and services rather than retaining detailed control and knowlegde themselves. This promotes cost efficiency and is a valid business practice.

At least as long as the field they operate in is stable.

The problem is that it makes businesses vulnerable to disruptive change, and when disruptive change does occur companies usually struggle to re-evolve talents that they shedded when their business matured. The trick is to realize the necessity of restructuring what they do and how and to do so before loss of revenue makes it hard or impossible. The first reaction, though, is often to cut cost. Which is a great way to start the downward spiral.

It is almost like drowning: all your natural reflexes conspire against your survival.

I can't remember what this cycle is called, but I read about it in some textbook used at business schools, so it is probably part of a typical MBA curriculum. (The rest of the book was too dull for me to actually remember its title).

When Apple raised the standard for handsets and brought handset software significantly closer to state of the art of software in general, handset manufacturers were caught napping. Then they panicked. And now they are taking on water.

Re: Rescuing Nokia? A former exec has a radical plan

#50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Symbian S60 and Symbian 3rd gen is the same (or actually 3rd gen is subset of S60); Maemo and MeeGo is the same. That makes it down to two platfoms. They actually have also S40, but that is for feature phones. I believe that they want to get rid of S40, put S60 on low end and MeeGo on high end phones.

OK, I've got my facts backwards... Good for them on Maemo/MeeGo, I though they'd completely lost it there. But Symbian 3rd gen (aka. Symbian^3) is indeed different from S60 (which has 4 editions: 1, 2, 3 and 5), with 5th edition becoming Symbian^1. As a matter of fact, Symbian^4 (in which the current UI is replaced by the Nokia Qt SDK) is positioned for a 2011 launch according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbian_…

Yes, I agree with you, they lost focus wrt their platforms. The first step for them is decide, what they want and then follow with steps to achieve that. And only that, no forking and dead ends.
Post reply on HN