Live data from Hacker News

An Update on Firefox Containers

blog.mozilla.org

91–100 of 107 posts

Re: An Update on Firefox Containers

#91

This just isn't what I want. In Chrome I have two separate profiles: work, and home. This lets me have work and home specific history, extensions, and settings. Opening a new tab in one doesn't bleed into the other. This is what I want. It's literally the only thing keeping me in Chrome these days. Firefox used to have something like this in the past, but it's either buried deep inside some obscure setting or has bee…

[deleted]

Re: An Update on Firefox Containers

#92
post #87

On a related note, does Firefox implement something like Safari's "Intelligent Tracking Prevention"[0] that times out third-party cookies? Advertisers seem to be mad[1], so they must be doing something right. [0] https://webkit.org/blog/7675/intelligent-tracking-prevention... [1] https://www.theverge.com/2017/9/14/16308138/apple-safari-11-...

Yes: since version 42, Nov 2015.

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Firefox/Privacy/Tracking...

Re: An Update on Firefox Containers

#93
post #85

A question for clarification: Containers don't prevent the browser from leaking information such as the addons and fonts installed, right? In other words, the browser fingerprint would still be revealed? If this is the case then containers might be an okayish first step but may convey a false sense of security to the user.

You can't (at least currently) allow / block extensions by container.

The security and ease-of-use is simply a separate storage for sessions / cookies / etc for each container. Nothing more, nothing less.

If you're concerned about privacy and leaking information there are a TON of tweaks you can do to about:config or via a user.js file such as: https://www.ghacks.net/2015/08/18/a-comprehensive-list-of-fi...

Re: An Update on Firefox Containers

#94

This just isn't what I want. In Chrome I have two separate profiles: work, and home. This lets me have work and home specific history, extensions, and settings. Opening a new tab in one doesn't bleed into the other. This is what I want. It's literally the only thing keeping me in Chrome these days. Firefox used to have something like this in the past, but it's either buried deep inside some obscure setting or has bee…

It still has it, although is not as easy to access as in Chrome. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Firefox/Multiple_profile...

As soon as this is implemented directly into Firefox and easily accessible, I'll ditch chrome for good. I rely too much on separate profiles to give this feature up.

Re: An Update on Firefox Containers

#95

I love this feature, but it seems missing a critical thing. You can say 'always open websites A1, A2, A3 in container Y' but you can't say 'container Y only hosts websites A1, A2, A3'. After time the container gets polluted with cookies from links clicked on website Ax. Hopefully this gets fixed soon. Edit: replaces 1 website with multiple websites Edit 2 : Another useful feature, would be cookie policy per container…

I want different settings for different containers. Sure, isolating cookies is helpful, but let me send them through different proxies too.

This is a key requirement to make this useful to the power user.

Re: An Update on Firefox Containers

#96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It still has it, although is not as easy to access as in Chrome. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Firefox/Multiple_profile...

As soon as this is implemented directly into Firefox and easily accessible, I'll ditch chrome for good. I rely too much on separate profiles to give this feature up.

It's not quite as elegant as chrome, but you can go to about:profiles to manage profiles from within firefox. It allows you to create/delete profiles and launch a given profile in a new window.

Re: An Update on Firefox Containers

#97

Is there a way I can convert a current tab to a container? I press by default and maybe I want to sort it later. That is, without opening a new container and copy pasting the address.

Update: I looked around and it does not seem there is a way, they seem not to want to do it either. The flow of copy, open new container tab, paste, seems pretty cumbersome to me. Especially if you want to move a tab to a different container or into one. If it weren't for this issue I'd love to use them.

I do like that you can hide containers or manipulate them as a group. This has great organizational benefits.

Re: An Update on Firefox Containers

#98
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As soon as this is implemented directly into Firefox and easily accessible, I'll ditch chrome for good. I rely too much on separate profiles to give this feature up.

It's not quite as elegant as chrome, but you can go to about:profiles to manage profiles from within firefox. It allows you to create/delete profiles and launch a given profile in a new window.

I imagine, there's also going to be add-ons that make this even more accessible.

Re: An Update on Firefox Containers

#99
post #87

On a related note, does Firefox implement something like Safari's "Intelligent Tracking Prevention"[0] that times out third-party cookies? Advertisers seem to be mad[1], so they must be doing something right. [0] https://webkit.org/blog/7675/intelligent-tracking-prevention... [1] https://www.theverge.com/2017/9/14/16308138/apple-safari-11-...

Yes: since version 42, Nov 2015. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Firefox/Privacy/Tracking...

That is a privacy feature, which also drove advertisers mad, but technology-wise, this is completely different.

Re: An Update on Firefox Containers

#100
post #87

On a related note, does Firefox implement something like Safari's "Intelligent Tracking Prevention"[0] that times out third-party cookies? Advertisers seem to be mad[1], so they must be doing something right. [0] https://webkit.org/blog/7675/intelligent-tracking-prevention... [1] https://www.theverge.com/2017/9/14/16308138/apple-safari-11-...

Don't think Mozilla could really afford to implement that right now. You can only piss off advertisers so much before webpage owners stop supporting your browser and Mozilla is already pissing off advertisers in many ways. Especially compared to Chrome which is worth supporting more due to its oversized market share, too.
Post reply on HN