> But without the corpus callosum the hemispheres have virtually no means of exchanging information They can communicate physically though. Each half of the brain can access the eyes and control various parts of the body, they could make the body do things that they could see/hear in order to act as a basic messaging channel. The conscious part of the brain could be completely oblivious to these subtle physical chann…
Not sure what would be the evolutionary purpose of that. I doubt that many of our ancestors survived brain split and managed to reproduce in order to pass the genes, so having that feature would probably mean it's necessary for something else... sounds like a long shot for me though.
When you split the brain, do you split the person?
21–30 of 78 posts
Re: When you split the brain, do you split the person?
#22> But without the corpus callosum the hemispheres have virtually no means of exchanging information They can communicate physically though. Each half of the brain can access the eyes and control various parts of the body, they could make the body do things that they could see/hear in order to act as a basic messaging channel. The conscious part of the brain could be completely oblivious to these subtle physical chann…
Not sure what would be the evolutionary purpose of that. I doubt that many of our ancestors survived brain split and managed to reproduce in order to pass the genes, so having that feature would probably mean it's necessary for something else... sounds like a long shot for me though.
Re: When you split the brain, do you split the person?
#23>How does a brain, consisting of many modules, create just one person? The same way a population, consisting of many people, creates just one state? The state is not the people and the people are not the state, yet both exist.
I am not my neurons, my neurons are not me, but my identity is driven by those neurons. Exactly... a non-mystery. But a great example of "the whole being greater than the sum of its parts".
Re: When you split the brain, do you split the person?
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am not my neurons, my neurons are not me, but my identity is driven by those neurons. Exactly... a non-mystery. But a great example of "the whole being greater than the sum of its parts".
I think Daniel Dennett said it best: Not a single one of the cells that compose you knows who you are, or cares.
Re: When you split the brain, do you split the person?
#25Re: When you split the brain, do you split the person?
#26>How does a brain, consisting of many modules, create just one person? The same way a population, consisting of many people, creates just one state? The state is not the people and the people are not the state, yet both exist.
Re: When you split the brain, do you split the person?
#27Re: When you split the brain, do you split the person?
#28That's when I found how useful a 'perhaps' can be. LOL.
Re: When you split the brain, do you split the person?
#29>How does a brain, consisting of many modules, create just one person? The same way a population, consisting of many people, creates just one state? The state is not the people and the people are not the state, yet both exist.
But a state isn't conscious
Re: When you split the brain, do you split the person?
#30>How does a brain, consisting of many modules, create just one person? The same way a population, consisting of many people, creates just one state? The state is not the people and the people are not the state, yet both exist.
But a state isn't conscious