Earlier quoted context omitted.
Use force touch, unfortunately there was no time to add visual guidelines for it. Let me know if it works
Force touch works, but why is the interaction different from other browsers?
Draggable JS – a lightweight, responsive, modern drag-and-drop library
41–50 of 122 posts
Re: Draggable JS – a lightweight, responsive, modern drag-and-drop library
#42I recently build a drag & drop feature for a customer with http://interactjs.io/ . The example page might not be as flashy, but it seems more reliable across browsers.
Re: Draggable JS – a lightweight, responsive, modern drag-and-drop library
#43This website is absolutely incredible, wow! It might well be the most beautiful open source project homepage out there. Any other entries that even come close?!
Re: Draggable JS – a lightweight, responsive, modern drag-and-drop library
#44I recently build a drag & drop feature for a customer with http://interactjs.io/ . The example page might not be as flashy, but it seems more reliable across browsers.
Re: Draggable JS – a lightweight, responsive, modern drag-and-drop library
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
Use force touch, unfortunately there was no time to add visual guidelines for it. Let me know if it works
I'm a long time Mac user but didn't realized that my Macbook has force touch functionality until now. Cannot see how 'force touch' adds any value, though.
I guess if you want to scroll the page instead of dragging elements - having force touch helps distinguish two actions. I know it's different but in google maps for example it's super annoying when instead of scrolling down the page - the map iframe is trying to zoom out.
Re: Draggable JS – a lightweight, responsive, modern drag-and-drop library
#46Why would they showcase the drag and drop coupled with this intriguing isometric block UI? It really takes the focus away from the core functionality of the library. I was totally focused on how the blocks interact. It's not anywhere close to the type of apps I build so the examples do not really give me a feel how well it may work for typical CRUD use cases.
Because it looks and feels awesome!? :-)
Seriously though, I didn't think it took that much away from the core functionally. I quite enjoyed testing the limits of the functionality with the demo.
Re: Draggable JS – a lightweight, responsive, modern drag-and-drop library
#47I'm on Safari 11.0 (macOS 10.12.6) and none of it works…
Re: Draggable JS – a lightweight, responsive, modern drag-and-drop library
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm a long time Mac user but didn't realized that my Macbook has force touch functionality until now. Cannot see how 'force touch' adds any value, though.
> Cannot see how 'force touch' adds any value, though. I guess if you want to scroll the page instead of dragging elements - having force touch helps distinguish two actions. I know it's different but in google maps for example it's super annoying when instead of scrolling down the page - the map iframe is trying to zoom out.
Re: Draggable JS – a lightweight, responsive, modern drag-and-drop library
#49I recently build a drag & drop feature for a customer with http://interactjs.io/ . The example page might not be as flashy, but it seems more reliable across browsers.