What happens after a defendant is found not guilty by reason of insanity?
1–10 of 143 posts
Re: What happens after a defendant is found not guilty by reason of insanity?
#2Couldn't the supreme court rule this type of punishment as "cruel and unusual punishment"? Technically there is a policy of reviewing "every 2 years" in perpetuity, so it's not like they don't have a formal punishment.
They mention a Supreme Court ruling regarding "due process" but not the 8th amendment. So it's basically as if this is sidestepping the constitution by pretending they aren't being punished?
https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Eighth_Amendment_to_the_United_S...
Re: What happens after a defendant is found not guilty by reason of insanity?
#3> In most states, like New York, there is no limit to the duration of that commitment. Couldn't the supreme court rule this type of punishment as "cruel and unusual punishment"? Technically there is a policy of reviewing "every 2 years" in perpetuity, so it's not like they don't have a formal punishment. They mention a Supreme Court ruling regarding "due process" but not the 8th amendment. So it's basically as if thi…
The Supreme Court has ruled that lifetime sex offender registration, despite few demonstrable positive effects on sex offender rehabilitation or sex offense prevention and despite their only apparent goal being the unpersoning of people who commit certain offenses, does not transgress the Eight Amendment because the sex offender registries are a "public safety" measure, not an actual punishment. Doubtless they will do the same for something like this.
Re: What happens after a defendant is found not guilty by reason of insanity?
#4> In most states, like New York, there is no limit to the duration of that commitment. Couldn't the supreme court rule this type of punishment as "cruel and unusual punishment"? Technically there is a policy of reviewing "every 2 years" in perpetuity, so it's not like they don't have a formal punishment. They mention a Supreme Court ruling regarding "due process" but not the 8th amendment. So it's basically as if thi…
This is what you will continually see, and only a separate state, such as the Federal Government existing in parallel jurisdiction, is able to step in, which it doesn't do mostly for historical reasons.
Re: What happens after a defendant is found not guilty by reason of insanity?
#5Re: What happens after a defendant is found not guilty by reason of insanity?
#6Re: What happens after a defendant is found not guilty by reason of insanity?
#7A decade later, he's been released- under a lot of conditions and on a lot of medication, but people are very upset that he'd ever be free at all. In interviews, he's a very interesting person. "Regret" and "shame" aren't strong enough words.
It's a hard debate- if he was not guilty due to a medical condition, then he was not found guilty and shouldn't be in prison, certainly. But he did cut a guy's head off. Would you want to live next to the guy who did that while not in control of himself?
It's the extreme end of the situation, to be certain, but extremes are a great place to examine any system.
Re: What happens after a defendant is found not guilty by reason of insanity?
#8> In most states, like New York, there is no limit to the duration of that commitment. Couldn't the supreme court rule this type of punishment as "cruel and unusual punishment"? Technically there is a policy of reviewing "every 2 years" in perpetuity, so it's not like they don't have a formal punishment. They mention a Supreme Court ruling regarding "due process" but not the 8th amendment. So it's basically as if thi…
Re: What happens after a defendant is found not guilty by reason of insanity?
#9In Canada they get treatment and are set free without restrictions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_of_Tim_McLean#Aftermat...
Re: What happens after a defendant is found not guilty by reason of insanity?
#10There was a very high profile case in Ontario over a decade ago. Basically, the man went into an absolute psychotic state on the travelling bus and cut the head off a stranger while everyone else on the bus ran for their lives. A decade later, he's been released- under a lot of conditions and on a lot of medication, but people are very upset that he'd ever be free at all. In interviews, he's a very interesting person…
No, he's been given an 'absolute discharge'. There are no legal obligations for him.