Live data from Hacker News

Giving you more characters

blog.twitter.com

441–450 of 493 posts

Re: Giving you more characters

#441
post #305
post #224

It would seem to me that the solution to the problem described in the blog would be to reduce the number of characters allowed for Japanese, Korean, and Chinese users. The whole appeal of twitter, I thought, was if you said what you wanted to say the system forced you to reconsider how you said it until you got down to the bare essence of what you were trying to convey. I'd be in favor of a maximum number of tweets p…

They found out that Japanese Twitter users don’t run up against the character limit, and are less frustrated as a result. The point is to make everybody else less frustrated, not to make the Japanese as frustrated as everybody else.

Found the UX designer in this sea of clueless engineers

Re: Giving you more characters

#442

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree with you that the 140 is iconic and it's probably not a good idea to abandon it. What's more, I feel like there was a very simple, elegant solution to this all along. It was to allow long-form text as a type of embedded media, treating it the same as video and pictures. That way you don't lose the iconic 140 characters thing, and you don't have any problem to solve by making weird compromises where the user n…

Better solution is to let users solve a complicated CAPTCHA when they want to tweet longer messages. That way, there is no social pressure to make long tweets (no reasonable person can pressure you to solve boring CAPTCHAs), while it's still there if you need it. Or, phrased differently, they should make it harder to tweet longer messages.

Micropayments! /s

Re: Giving you more characters

#443
post #64

Seems like one possible solution is to increase the character limit, but also increase the "pain" a user has to go through to use the additional characters (my ghetto solution would be to use a captcha to unlock the higher char limit). That way people would only use the additional chars if they really needed them, reducing noise from otherwise unnecessarily long tweets.

"Watch this 30-second ad to expand your character limit by 30 characters for this tweet!"

Anything to disincentivize casual use of the huge limit.

Re: Giving you more characters

#445

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Better solution is to let users solve a complicated CAPTCHA when they want to tweet longer messages. That way, there is no social pressure to make long tweets (no reasonable person can pressure you to solve boring CAPTCHAs), while it's still there if you need it. Or, phrased differently, they should make it harder to tweet longer messages.

Micropayments! /s

That is exactly my thought. Actually it was microtransactions.

Re: Giving you more characters

#446
They shot themselves in the foot by putting this ridiculous limit! Make it 500, or, better yet, limit the number of words, which makes more sense, but I don't use Twitter much if at all, because I hate broken English, missing punctuation, and having to restructure your thought to fit into the SMS limit of the '90s!

Re: Giving you more characters

#447

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah GTFO nazi lover, you definitely not belong on Mastodon.

Took a look at your post history. It's rather negative and angry and projecting. This kind of anti-social speech is detrimental to a healty community and if you represent the average person on Mastodon then I will stay far away.

I have no idea what was written here before it was flag-killed, but "negative and angry and projecting" doesn't describe my experience with people on Mastodon. Very much the opposite.

Re: Giving you more characters

#450

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree with you that the 140 is iconic and it's probably not a good idea to abandon it. What's more, I feel like there was a very simple, elegant solution to this all along. It was to allow long-form text as a type of embedded media, treating it the same as video and pictures. That way you don't lose the iconic 140 characters thing, and you don't have any problem to solve by making weird compromises where the user n…

> What's more, I feel like there was a very simple, elegant solution to this all along. It was to allow long-form text as a type of embedded media, treating it the same as video and pictures. How is that elegant?

People often using the word "elegant" when they actually mean "my preferred."

It helps give credence to the solution.

Post reply on HN