Live data from Hacker News

Jacquard by Google transforms clothing

atap.google.com

31–40 of 168 posts

Re: Jacquard by Google transforms clothing

#31

I feel like we are pushing this wearable tech thing too hard. Pushing all the cool ways we can put stuff into things (ordering pizza from your shoes, snapchatting from your glasses) but they ALWAYS boil down to "You can touch XYZ instead of your phone to pause your music". When we will get some decent applications, instead of enhancing the form

I think the basic problem there is that we have run out of things do to via mobile in general, at least outside of the corporate world. Frankly most of what people do on "smartphones" today that is not work related could be done on featurephones a decade or more ago.

This is kind of sad. Computers in general should let us do more stuff outside corporate world. That's pretty much the definition of empowering humans. But I guess it doesn't monetize well enough.

Re: Jacquard by Google transforms clothing

#33
post #25

The video gives a lot more detail than the website: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9ADVeNpypk No clue how to pronouce Jacquard btw. :(

If you type a single word into Google, it gives the definition and pronunciation.

/ˈjakərd/ https://ssl.gstatic.com/dictionary/static/sounds/20160317/ja...

Re: Jacquard by Google transforms clothing

#34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the basic problem there is that we have run out of things do to via mobile in general, at least outside of the corporate world. Frankly most of what people do on "smartphones" today that is not work related could be done on featurephones a decade or more ago.

This is kind of sad. Computers in general should let us do more stuff outside corporate world. That's pretty much the definition of empowering humans. But I guess it doesn't monetize well enough.

or there is simply only so many tasks that can be done without a human physically present, thus nullifying any point of doing it remotely.

Re: Jacquard by Google transforms clothing

#36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But as the "tag snap" is detachable (so you can wash the jacket) it seems you can use it on its own, or with any other piece of clothing. I have a hard time understanding what is the advantage of this over any smartwatch.

You can't use it on any other garment, because the touch sensor is woven into the fabric.

At this point it's getting ridiculous. They should have made a detachable touch sensor instead. Why on Earth should I need to buy a particular piece of clothing to get a feature that's encompassed in 1% of it?

I understand MVPs, but if you're going to actually integrate stuff into fabric, make it something more advanced than a single touchpad.

Re: Jacquard by Google transforms clothing

#38
I dig it. Ever since 'smart watches' started I've felt like grown men wearing digital watches is a bit awkward. I'd prefer more subtle things like Google Glass or tech woven into clothing fabrics.

We definitely need to get beyond smartphones and into more ubiquitous form factors so we don't evolve into creatures with our upper backs and necks contorted downwards.

I always liked this UI from Mission Impossible 5: https://imgur.com/6H1dJ2n

Re: Jacquard by Google transforms clothing

#39
post #38

I dig it. Ever since 'smart watches' started I've felt like grown men wearing digital watches is a bit awkward. I'd prefer more subtle things like Google Glass or tech woven into clothing fabrics. We definitely need to get beyond smartphones and into more ubiquitous form factors so we don't evolve into creatures with our upper backs and necks contorted downwards. I always liked this UI from Mission Impossible 5: http…

Related, CPS suite from Continuum series.

A fun feature it had that I would love to have on real clothing - you could pop up a slider and change the color of the suit.

EDIT: here's a video of its various features:

https://vimeo.com/64120587

Post reply on HN