The real problem is the lack of explanation. If a film is refused certification, it will usually come with a list of reasons, making it possible to recut to an acceptable version. If it's demonetised by youtube you get no explanation. Yes, that will result in people working exactly up to the line, but at least having a line is something that people can work with.
Why Is YouTube Demonetizing LGBTQ Videos?
21–30 of 67 posts
Re: Why Is YouTube Demonetizing LGBTQ Videos?
#22Is there a specific marker that marks a video as "demonetized" vs no advertiser wants to put an ad on it?
Re: Why Is YouTube Demonetizing LGBTQ Videos?
#23The real problem is the lack of explanation. If a film is refused certification, it will usually come with a list of reasons, making it possible to recut to an acceptable version. If it's demonetised by youtube you get no explanation. Yes, that will result in people working exactly up to the line, but at least having a line is something that people can work with.
I'm not sure if there is a line. Here are two identical videos, and the one with "transgender" in the title was demonetized. https://twitter.com/GeekRemix/status/910942349928419328 (edited with larger sample)
Re: Why Is YouTube Demonetizing LGBTQ Videos?
#24https://twitter.com/BradyHaran/status/901041339105673217 https://twitter.com/BradyHaran/status/901044151806021632 https://twitter.com/BradyHaran/status/906592700132196352
Re: Why Is YouTube Demonetizing LGBTQ Videos?
#25The real problem is the lack of explanation. If a film is refused certification, it will usually come with a list of reasons, making it possible to recut to an acceptable version. If it's demonetised by youtube you get no explanation. Yes, that will result in people working exactly up to the line, but at least having a line is something that people can work with.
Maybe for most countries, but not America. The MPAA movie rating system here is a nightmare. The rating standards are private, and if they rate you NC17 or X or what have you, they'll refuse to give any reasons as to why, because that would imply they engage in censorship. The rating system is not government-run either, so it's partially controlled by clergy members, and treats gay films more harshly. "This Film Is N…
Re: Why Is YouTube Demonetizing LGBTQ Videos?
#26I wonder if this violates various local ordinances against LGBT discrimination?
it is going to give these sites all sorts of ways to make revenue without having to share it
Re: Why Is YouTube Demonetizing LGBTQ Videos?
#27FWIW, youtube has been demonetizing videos that promote conservative POVs. (Edit: Gee, I didn't think this would upset people enough to attract so many downvotes. Looks like I was wrong.)
I personally noticed it first when all the machining channels that discussed homemade firearms were demonitized.
The difference in this case is that the claims made by op's article are legally actionable under protected class laws.
Re: Why Is YouTube Demonetizing LGBTQ Videos?
#28FWIW, youtube has been demonetizing videos that promote conservative POVs. (Edit: Gee, I didn't think this would upset people enough to attract so many downvotes. Looks like I was wrong.)
I am willing to wager that more action will be seen with regards to LGBTQ channels being demonetized than conservative channels. Google never really tried to hide their left leaning biases.
I don't think YouTube is purposefully demonitizing videos on conservative fiscal theories.
Re: Why Is YouTube Demonetizing LGBTQ Videos?
#29Instead of demonetizing everything, I think YouTube should emphasize to its advertisers that while both television and YouTube are media companies, that doesn't mean they have the same market share, and thus shouldn't be advertised on in the same way that television does. At the same time, I think YouTube should make it known that advertisement on a video shouldn't equate to endorsement by that advertiser.
Re: Why Is YouTube Demonetizing LGBTQ Videos?
#30I can see why advertisers would not want to risk hurting their brand by playing before a video that is anyway offensive to anyone. If you give that power to them then they will use it. Which can be a problem if you are trying to have an open free speech platform where ideas are shared. I think that is not Google's motivation though. They want to make money. Which again is understandable but not necessarily what the world needs.