And what is the point? Does the price prove that bitcoin has not failed? To me, bitcoin died sometime in 2013 when mining became hopelessly centralised, breaking the economic and security models Satoshi had set forth. The bitcoin thereafter has been a soulness Frankenstein animated by a mixture of ego, greed, and hubris. I don't want to make any predictions, but when the crash comes it will be over before you knew it…
Bitcoin can't die as it never succeeded. All the disingenuous claims made by early adopters have fallen through. Decentralization, control, anonymity, easy transactions, transactions costs, currency? How can something that has no use have value? Proponents continue to build castles and waste electricity hoping people bite so they can profit. But the game is over. Money is a social tool based on consensus, and today d…
Bitcoin has died 166 times, so far
61–70 of 179 posts
Re: Bitcoin has died 166 times, so far
#62Weird.
Re: Bitcoin has died 166 times, so far
#63The reality is that bitcoin has the first mover advantage. Any other virtual currency has a big mountain to climb to catch up to it. 100 years from now bitcoin will be around since there is no one entity that defines it and control it. What the community has shown is that they are willing to adapt to the situation. Right now bitcoin has problems but as time moves the code will be modified. What's happening now is tha…
I'm not certain that's true. Most of the trading in bitcoin is based on speculation that it'll rise in value, and secondly, that'll become more commonplace. Currently, it's not a useful (or usable) form of currency for the vast majority of the planet. So there's no value backing it (yet).
The true test is in X many years, whether BitCoin will be used as actual currency, in which case the value will keep climbing, or whether it'll remain a speculative investment, in which case it'll crash.
I learned about bitcoin when it was less than a dollar, and I'd love to invest, but it's just gambling.
Re: Bitcoin has died 166 times, so far
#64Many people on HN are so negative in bitcoin that it seems that they are focused on the tree instead of the forest. This technology can solve the main problem human society faces and this is corruption. Human greed is what keeps bitcoin alive but this is not a bug, it is a feature.
Re: Bitcoin has died 166 times, so far
#65My point is not to confirm or deny the bear or the bull, but to point out this is simply noise.
When are market news reliable indicators of supply and demand?
Re: Bitcoin has died 166 times, so far
#66One of the early obituaries on that list mentions that the finite supply of bitcoins, combined with lost crypto keys and hoarding will eventually lead to a situation where there aren't enough coins for it to be a viable currency. Clearly, in that situation you can subdivide coins as far as required, so it isn't a risk to bitcoin as such. However, I have often wondered if there is any estimate of the "effective supply…
So, there are probably a lot of private keys that get lost, but not a lot of bitcoins.
Re: Bitcoin has died 166 times, so far
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't understand how the issue you're describing is specific to bitcoin. Consider that wealth in the real world also accumulates in a non gaussian distribution.
I think the comment is saying that in other currencies, if your currency's total value increases, usually more money is printed to keep the value reasonable. Even with other cryptocurrencies, Ripple for instance has a large unallocated holding of coins that they're meant to siphon out into the market to keep the value per coin under control. Whereas with bitcoin you can hold onto the same amount of money and if more…
This is called currency "deflation" (the opposite of inflation), and it's one of the key things that central banks try to control. If a currency is gaining value rapidly, then it makes more sense for people to hold onto it, no one buys anything, and the economy drives to a halt. In these cases, central banks may print money to lower the value of the currency.
The effects of how it would play out with Bitcoin are probably different, as it isn't close to being universal, it travels across political borders, no single economy relies on it, and it's under no control. Sounds like an Econ PhD thesis.
Re: Bitcoin has died 166 times, so far
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
Isn't the greater problem that the total market cap of bitcoin is always going to be 22 million? In other words, the single bitcoin I own will always be worth 1/22M of the entire market cap, regardless of how much it's used. And I only own one. There are lost of people out there who owns thousands of bitcoins. 1000 bitcoins is 1/22k of the entire market cap. How could this be sustainable?
Exactly. It looks like a Ponzi scheme for early miners to get rich.
But the truth is that at this point, it's still mostly gambling. The use-cases for BitCoin are numerous, but I don't see many in place just yet. Right now, the value is based solely on speculation.
Re: Bitcoin has died 166 times, so far
#69It's almost as if writing about Bitcoin crashing sold newspapers/pageviews... Weird.
Re: Bitcoin has died 166 times, so far
#70With nickel and paper money, banks can create as much cash as they like, it's virtual value, not real. Crypto currency is just like that, but more secure and not (yet) controlled by the banks. And again you see the allegations that crypto would be a pyramid scheme etc.. Do people notice that our actual economy/financial-system is a very proven pyramid scheme? All money flows to the rich. And especially those people in power now, are getting a little nervous seeing they might lose some control.
Crypto currencies can be a boon for humanity, unless governments are going to criminalize it and only allow banks to use the technology.