31–40 of 70 posts
Unrelated to python 3.7, but they recently added this feature that you can add two dictionaries together in 3.5 by doing: new_dict = {**dict1, **dict2} It is so handy and nice
What happens to duplicate keys?
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0448/
EDIT: yeah, nvm, it's what everyone else said.
Woooo! That means, at some future time, I'll be able to remove code checks for non-threading Pythons.
Unrelated to python 3.7, but they recently added this feature that you can add two dictionaries together in 3.5 by doing: new_dict = {**dict1, **dict2} It is so handy and nice
What happens to duplicate keys?
>>> dict1 = {"key1": 1, "key2": "hello", "key3": [1, 2, 3]}
>>> dict2 = {key1": 1, "key2": "world", "key3": [1, 4], "key4": "4"}
>>> {**dict1, **dict2}
{'key1': 1, 'key2': 'world', 'key3': [1, 4], 'key4': '4'}Earlier quoted context omitted.
What happens to duplicate keys?
I think it raises an exception. https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0448/ EDIT: yeah, nvm, it's what everyone else said.
>>> a = {'x': 1}
>>> b = {'x': 2}
>>> {**a, **b}
{'x': 2}
>>> {**b, **a}
{'x': 1}Unrelated to python 3.7, but they recently added this feature that you can add two dictionaries together in 3.5 by doing: new_dict = {**dict1, **dict2} It is so handy and nice
Unrelated to python 3.7, but they recently added this feature that you can add two dictionaries together in 3.5 by doing: new_dict = {**dict1, **dict2} It is so handy and nice
Seems similar to the spread operator in JavaScript: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Refe...
Unrelated to python 3.7, but they recently added this feature that you can add two dictionaries together in 3.5 by doing: new_dict = {**dict1, **dict2} It is so handy and nice
What happens to duplicate keys?
Switching the default encoding from ASCII to utf-8 sounds like a pretty big change.
The only real question is: When am I going to be able to name my variable as emojis?
edit: I take that back. Apparently thebunicode allowed in identifers is not unrestricted..... in my defense I don't use unicode identifiers as a rule....
Switching the default encoding from ASCII to utf-8 sounds like a pretty big change.
The only real question is: When am I going to be able to name my variable as emojis?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The only real question is: When am I going to be able to name my variable as emojis?
You've been able to do that for a while. edit: I take that back. Apparently thebunicode allowed in identifers is not unrestricted..... in my defense I don't use unicode identifiers as a rule....