Live data from Hacker News

Patreon raises big round at $450M valuation

techcrunch.com

11–20 of 145 posts

Re: Patreon raises big round at $450M valuation

#11

Patreon is fighting the good fight so far, especially with YT promoting more disposable content with every passing day

Patreon is falling into the same problem, banning people who they don't agree with.

People are moving all their eggs from Youtube to Patreon.

Re: Patreon raises big round at $450M valuation

#13
That's a P/E of 60... Also this:

> In exchange, Patreon takes only a tiny 5% cut.

I hope this is sarcasm, because if I had to pay 5% to make any other transaction I'd be fuming. With a marginal cost of facilitating a new patron near zero, I don't think creators or patrons will suffer this as Patreon grows.

Re: Patreon raises big round at $450M valuation

#14

Patreon is fighting the good fight so far, especially with YT promoting more disposable content with every passing day

Patreon is falling into the same problem, banning people who they don't agree with. People are moving all their eggs from Youtube to Patreon.

Do you have an example?

Re: Patreon raises big round at $450M valuation

#15

That means they're going to expect a lot of revenue. Which they plan to take on money that people give freely. I don't see that ending well.

I use Patreon on a lot, and I don't have any expectation that they are doing it for free. If they were doing it for free, then that would mean to me that the service would be unstable and would disappear some random month without recourse when its unpaid developer gets a job somewhere else, or someone files some light lawsuit against them and that's enough to take the whole thing down.

A bigger problem than that they take a cut is probably some expectations management on why, what that cut does for everyone, and what it would mean to not have it.

Re: Patreon raises big round at $450M valuation

#17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Patreon is falling into the same problem, banning people who they don't agree with. People are moving all their eggs from Youtube to Patreon.

Do you have an example?

Maybe not the best example but Lauren Southern is one. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtImwK5TI4g

Re: Patreon raises big round at $450M valuation

#18

Patreon is fighting the good fight so far, especially with YT promoting more disposable content with every passing day

Patreon is falling into the same problem, banning people who they don't agree with. People are moving all their eggs from Youtube to Patreon.

"People are moving all their eggs from Youtube to Patreon."

That's less of a concern though, because Patreon is easier to replace than YouTube. The problem with YouTube is that, at least as long as the Internet chatter I hear is still accurate, YouTube itself is still losing money, so replacing YouTube involves being able to immediately hugely subsidize people watching lots of video, and to be willing to do so when it is demonstrated that even the market leader who gets all the good ad contracts is losing money, so there's no payday if you win. That's a tough sell.

Patreon can't literally be replaced in the legendary "HN denizen claims to be able to replace $X in a weekend", because dealing with taking payments takes longer than that. But it's feasible down in that range, and said replacement at least has a cash flow and a clear path to ramen profitability. It's gonna be a competitive field and Patreon has all the name advantage right now, but it's a feasible plan for a "true startup" of just a few people in a garage in a way that "let's replace YouTube!" isn't.

In fact there's at least three competing services I've heard of that already exist, and I have no reason to believe I've heard of them all.

Re: Patreon raises big round at $450M valuation

#19

That's a P/E of 60... Also this: > In exchange, Patreon takes only a tiny 5% cut. I hope this is sarcasm, because if I had to pay 5% to make any other transaction I'd be fuming. With a marginal cost of facilitating a new patron near zero, I don't think creators or patrons will suffer this as Patreon grows.

>if I had to pay 5% to make any other transaction I'd be fuming.

Fyi... for comparison, Kickstarter fee is also 5% of funds raised. https://www.google.com/search?q=kickstarter+fee

Re: Patreon raises big round at $450M valuation

#20

That's a P/E of 60... Also this: > In exchange, Patreon takes only a tiny 5% cut. I hope this is sarcasm, because if I had to pay 5% to make any other transaction I'd be fuming. With a marginal cost of facilitating a new patron near zero, I don't think creators or patrons will suffer this as Patreon grows.

Creators accept Patreon's high transaction cost because they don't many other options. If you, for example, are a youtuber, chances are that Google will screw you out of video monetization because their subpar AI raises more flags than a signalman on acid. Other payment solutions like Pay Pal are a goddamn nightmare to set up and handle for micro businesses [0]. Patreon also acts like a landing page and even CMS for content creators, so you're paying for that too.

[0] Holy shit is Pay Pal the most dysfunctional organization I've ever dealt with. Just verifying my identity as a business owner has meant weeks of me sending countless copies of my bank statements, phone bills and photo ID to Pay Pal staff because apparently comparing the address on the submitted documents with the one on file is too difficult a task. In the end it was easier to change my address on file so it matches the one of the submitted documents character by character (yay security theater). Of course when they finally verified my address I got an email that the copy of the photo ID I submitted suddenly was "too pale and is illegible as a result" and now I can't even access the verification process page...

Post reply on HN