Live data from Hacker News

Ford disguised a man as a car seat to research self-driving

techcrunch.com

111–120 of 144 posts

Re: Ford disguised a man as a car seat to research self-driving

#111

"they just needed people to believe wholeheartedly they were using one." Don't they mean "seeing one" instead of "using one"? Or am I missing something? "fill in gaps where we currently communicate via subtle gestures, eye contact and other less obvious mechanisms." This also struck me as odd - do pedestrians and other drivers really make "eye contact" with drivers to gauge their intention? I guess it's possible, but…

> This also struck me as odd - do pedestrians and other drivers really make "eye contact" with drivers to gauge their intention?

This statement both terrifies and piques my interest simultaneously ...

Re: Ford disguised a man as a car seat to research self-driving

#113
post #81
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do like in Canada: all cars must have their headlights on when driving (the lights automatically turn on). edit: also, I feel like if we add new light signals for acceleration, for example, it would be nice to add that to all cars.

Those are daytime running lights. I wish headlights were mandatory, that would eliminate people driving in rainy twilight without lights on.

In California, you must have your headlights on if your wipers are on.

Re: Ford disguised a man as a car seat to research self-driving

#114

It sounds goofy, but this strikes me as really clever. Compared to almost anything else with self driving cars adding a few indicators to outwardly show what it's going to do next (for pedestrians and other drivers) is a huge win. There is a fair amount of waving for someone else to go first at a turn, seeing if a driver is distracted (on their phone) at a stop, making eye contact while using a cross walk etc that ge…

I can't recall properly where I read it, but some time ago there was an idea to have stop signals also in front of the car, so the pedestrians would know if the driver/car is stopping.

There are also pedestrians who can take into account if the car is turning (obviously by watching the turning lights).

A self-driving car should have some reactions to people around it, so people could also respond properly to its actions, or know its intentions. There was a comment about an empty electric car near the intersection, staying still, and people around it can't tell if the car is parked, waiting, etc.

Re: Ford disguised a man as a car seat to research self-driving

#115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've always wanted front brake lights for cars, that way as a pedestrian (or other driver) you can tell if a car is actively stopping as it's approaching you.

As a cyclist, I sometimes see cars approaching crosswalks at a crawl, just creeping along at a few feet per second. I do that on my bike too, because I'm hoping the light will change before I have to come to a complete stop and put my foot down, but I have no idea why drivers do it, and it definitely doesn't feel safe crossing in front of a car like that.

In an automatic car, it's just about fuel efficiency and wear/tear. In a manual, it's that plus it's extremely annoying to stop and go at each semaphore.

Re: Ford disguised a man as a car seat to research self-driving

#116

It sounds goofy, but this strikes me as really clever. Compared to almost anything else with self driving cars adding a few indicators to outwardly show what it's going to do next (for pedestrians and other drivers) is a huge win. There is a fair amount of waving for someone else to go first at a turn, seeing if a driver is distracted (on their phone) at a stop, making eye contact while using a cross walk etc that ge…

* SPOILER * That's how they made Knight Rider "driverless" scenes ( http://www.knightriderarchives.com/knight_rider/season_one/g... <= can't find a clear shot, but if you find episodes online, it's pretty easy to see the double depth seat and raised up armrests)

How did I go through life without knowing that?

Re: Ford disguised a man as a car seat to research self-driving

#118

Earlier quoted context omitted.

* SPOILER * That's how they made Knight Rider "driverless" scenes ( http://www.knightriderarchives.com/knight_rider/season_one/g... <= can't find a clear shot, but if you find episodes online, it's pretty easy to see the double depth seat and raised up armrests)

How did I go through life without knowing that?

You are not alone & I am with you

Re: Ford disguised a man as a car seat to research self-driving

#119

It sounds goofy, but this strikes me as really clever. Compared to almost anything else with self driving cars adding a few indicators to outwardly show what it's going to do next (for pedestrians and other drivers) is a huge win. There is a fair amount of waving for someone else to go first at a turn, seeing if a driver is distracted (on their phone) at a stop, making eye contact while using a cross walk etc that ge…

* SPOILER * That's how they made Knight Rider "driverless" scenes ( http://www.knightriderarchives.com/knight_rider/season_one/g... <= can't find a clear shot, but if you find episodes online, it's pretty easy to see the double depth seat and raised up armrests)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_DimUujL5wM

The guy who was hidden in the seat https://youtu.be/nfd3vWrQhS8?t=166

Here you can see the hands moving down https://youtu.be/nfd3vWrQhS8?t=183

Re: Ford disguised a man as a car seat to research self-driving

#120

It sounds goofy, but this strikes me as really clever. Compared to almost anything else with self driving cars adding a few indicators to outwardly show what it's going to do next (for pedestrians and other drivers) is a huge win. There is a fair amount of waving for someone else to go first at a turn, seeing if a driver is distracted (on their phone) at a stop, making eye contact while using a cross walk etc that ge…

I don't mean to be offensive, but can someone please explain to me how the Stop signs work in US? Am I correct to understand that whoever arrived at the stop sign first goes first, regardless of where they are going? Is this considered a good system?

In EU you have strictly defined priority at stop signs - put simply, if you are going straight you have priority over someone turning, if you are turning, then the person turning right has priority over someone turning left. Simple as that.

I'm just thinking in context of automatic vehicles a strictly defined priority rules are easier to follow, no?

Post reply on HN