Live data from Hacker News

I recommend against using biometric identification

medium.freecodecamp.org

1–10 of 239 posts

Re: I recommend against using biometric identification

#4
Unlocking your phone with face/finger prints is for many people much better than their 1234 pin.

As far as I understand, the face unlock follows the same rules as touch, where <48hrs of no use requires the PIN/password, and the newly announced 5 tap the power button to trigger the PIN/password requirement.

Re: I recommend against using biometric identification

#5
The issues raised in the article may explain why Apple just added the ability to passcode-lock your device by pressing the power button 5 times.

Though people have been raising similar issues about biometric identification for years. See this article from back when TouchID was released 2013, titled Fingerprints are Usernames, not Passwords. http://blog.dustinkirkland.com/2013/10/fingerprints-are-user...

Re: I recommend against using biometric identification

#8

The suggested alternative is to use passcodes, but then there's no way to unlock your phone without making the unlock code plainly visible.

I mean, it's less plainly visible then your face, or even pictures of your face.

I bet you there's an algorithm somewhere that can take a picture of your face and turn it into a 3d model. Then you can take that model, 3d print it, then use it to unlock your phone.

Re: I recommend against using biometric identification

#9
post #5

The issues raised in the article may explain why Apple just added the ability to passcode-lock your device by pressing the power button 5 times. Though people have been raising similar issues about biometric identification for years. See this article from back when TouchID was released 2013, titled Fingerprints are Usernames, not Passwords . http://blog.dustinkirkland.com/2013/10/fingerprints-are-user...

If the Equifax leak and the concerns around not being able to change ssns teach us nothing, it's this.
Post reply on HN