Earlier quoted context omitted.
At 18, a "child" can enlist in the military without parental consent. There are fighter pilots younger than 25 who are entrusted to fly SOLO in a $180m F-22 Raptor with live missiles. How do these so called High school administrators justify protecting "children" from every theoretically possible harm? While forgetting that in less than 2 years these same students might be going into combat as a member of the armed f…
> How do these so called High school administrators justify protecting "children" from every theoretically possible harm? While forgetting that in less than 2 years these same students might be going into combat as a member of the armed forces. Helicopter parents [1] and freely available student loans subsidized/backed by the federal government. The child/parent are the consumers of the service, but the negative exte…
[0] https://www.forbes.com/sites/paularmstrongtech/2017/06/19/th...
[0.1] (archive/no adblock) http://archive.is/RxqQg
[0.2] (archive/no adblock) http://archive.is/uJmoD
[1] https://www.inc.com/anna-hensel/the-1-incredibly-detailed-jo...