Live data from Hacker News

Smarter speed bump using non-Newtonian liquid

badennova.es

151–160 of 168 posts

Re: Smarter speed bump using non-Newtonian liquid

#151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've always wondered what it would look like to tie one of those roadside speed monitoring trailers (they have a sign telling you the speed limit, and your speed) which were in contact with a 'speed bump' filled with hydraulic fluid. The faster you go over the limit, the harder and taller the speed bump :-) If you did this with a camera system you could avoid penalizing emergency vehicles.

The main issue is that everything movable or deformable is going to get absolutely wrecked by vehicles, in short order. Even old-fashioned speed bumps get severe ridges worn into them by vehicles that go too fast. They need to be repaired after a year or two. And even if that doesn't happen, they experience severe forces from wheels, every single day. You (and the non-newtonian bump mentioned in the article) suggest…

Fair enough, although if you were using a hydraulic system you could be raising and lowering a concrete berm with your system which would take the wear and tear.

In Las Vegas they had very deep 'gullys' on either side of a street to facilitate flash floodwater and where those 'flood streets' crossed others there were 'speed ditches' :-) They were very effective as the wear and tear occurred on the car that was grounding out after going over them too quickly.

Chicanes are ok but people who try to go through them too fast and get stuck after colliding with one side or the other cause problems.

Re: Smarter speed bump using non-Newtonian liquid

#152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If I remember correctly I saw a Bose demo where they were able to roll their car over speed bumps and it would stay completely level. I’m not sure if that completely negated their impact, but it looked like it from the video.

It only worked so well because they rigged the tests. The suspension was tuned for exactly each demonstration, it wouldn't work under normal mixed conditions. The system was also extremely heavy and used a boatload of power for the actuators. A well-setup conventional suspension system works nearly as well for anything you would encounter in the real world, and it's a lot less expensive. Even Citroën (the kings of hy…

Ignoring street-legality and commercial feasibility, if the Bose suspension is automatically adjusted using feedback from e.g. LIDAR and/or depth cameras, wouldn't that solve the "tune for each demo" problem?

Re: Smarter speed bump using non-Newtonian liquid

#153
post #89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've always wondered what it would look like to tie one of those roadside speed monitoring trailers (they have a sign telling you the speed limit, and your speed) which were in contact with a 'speed bump' filled with hydraulic fluid. The faster you go over the limit, the harder and taller the speed bump :-) If you did this with a camera system you could avoid penalizing emergency vehicles.

> If you did this with a camera Yeah I've always felt like speed cameras should have been the "disruptive technology" for speed bumps but we're lagging behind for some reason, instead choosing to penalize everyone using the road. How often are speed bumps not doable at the speed the street allows, e.g. having to go 15-20kmh over the bump in a 30 zone, or more extreme, 5kmh in a 50 zone when they want you to watch out…

Speed cameras are slightly more expensive than a speedbump and way easier to sabotage. It's enough with some paint to disable it temporarily or just cut it down if you want it disabled a bit longer.

Re: Smarter speed bump using non-Newtonian liquid

#155

I stopped watching the video when they put a sexy lady dipping a finger in the liquid. Seriously it's 2017, you're trying to sell technology and you still objectify women.

> you still objectify women

I would rather live in a world where women are still an attraction.

Re: Smarter speed bump using non-Newtonian liquid

#156
post #153
post #89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If you did this with a camera Yeah I've always felt like speed cameras should have been the "disruptive technology" for speed bumps but we're lagging behind for some reason, instead choosing to penalize everyone using the road. How often are speed bumps not doable at the speed the street allows, e.g. having to go 15-20kmh over the bump in a 30 zone, or more extreme, 5kmh in a 50 zone when they want you to watch out…

Speed cameras are slightly more expensive than a speedbump and way easier to sabotage. It's enough with some paint to disable it temporarily or just cut it down if you want it disabled a bit longer.

The ones out on the highway here have just tended to get shot at I think.

Re: Smarter speed bump using non-Newtonian liquid

#157

I stopped watching the video when they put a sexy lady dipping a finger in the liquid. Seriously it's 2017, you're trying to sell technology and you still objectify women.

So you are one of these "current year" people? Also I want to point out that your assumption of gender from pure appearance is abhorrent.

Please don't concern troll.

Re: Smarter speed bump using non-Newtonian liquid

#158

I stopped watching the video when they put a sexy lady dipping a finger in the liquid. Seriously it's 2017, you're trying to sell technology and you still objectify women.

> you still objectify women I would rather live in a world where women are still an attraction.

Men are an attraction to about half the population of this world.

Re: Smarter speed bump using non-Newtonian liquid

#160
post #120

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've always wondered what it would look like to tie one of those roadside speed monitoring trailers (they have a sign telling you the speed limit, and your speed) which were in contact with a 'speed bump' filled with hydraulic fluid. The faster you go over the limit, the harder and taller the speed bump :-) If you did this with a camera system you could avoid penalizing emergency vehicles.

Or a significantly more expensive (and correspondingly reliable) infrastructure investment in two traffic lights, where speeding past the first one triggers the second. Also requires: two intersections; cameras and/or law enforcement to enforce an actual penalty.

Why wouldn't you just put up a speed camera at that point?
Post reply on HN