Live data from Hacker News

Text-only CNN

lite.cnn.io

91–100 of 319 posts

Re: Text-only CNN

#92
post #88

There seem to be no ads. How do they plan to make money with this?

Give it time. The original CNN site, many years ago, wasn't as slow and terrible as it is today. I'm not convinced history won't repeat itself if this version became popular.

Re: Text-only CNN

#93
post #88

There seem to be no ads. How do they plan to make money with this?

given that the ads are likely to be blocked by the target audience of that site, either donations, or subscriptions seems to be a good answer.

Re: Text-only CNN

#94
post #19

The absolute worst thing about cnn.com is the auto-playing videos. I've been in quiet places and clicked a CNN news link only to have a video start blasting on the speakers. It's not only annoying but a huge waste of mobile bandwidth. Now I just need an extension that rewrites all CNN urls to this site.

My computer's speakers are not plugged in. Problem solved.

Lol how I'd not being able to play any sound "problem solved?" You really reach down and plug your speakers in whenever it's time to play audio?

Re: Text-only CNN

#95
Why not just use RSS? This is time and effort wasted.

Given RSS is old, text only and has XML its very lightweight, has good support and fast readers.

No heavy javascript needed as readers of RSS are often native apps or browser plugins

Re: Text-only CNN

#96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Paper is rendered entirely server-side. Taking out a full-page newspaper ad is an attention-grabber. Taking out a full-page pop-up is merely an annoyance. Why does this perception exist? Why isn't digital space regarded on-par with paper space? Because of this, digital ads sell for much, much less than paper ads. And so ad-supported companies have to use 10x as many ads to get 1/10 the revenue. And these ads can gain…

It's also worth trying out http://www.brave.com if you want a lot of this bundled into a browser.

How can I get it to remember my exceptions to the Shield?

Re: Text-only CNN

#99

Why not just use RSS? This is time and effort wasted. Given RSS is old, text only and has XML its very lightweight, has good support and fast readers. No heavy javascript needed as readers of RSS are often native apps or browser plugins

> as readers of RSS are often native apps or browser plugins

That's probably why.

Most people can barely drive their web browser, and many tech people are reluctant to install new extensions, because of trust issues.

A web page, in a nice pure form like this, is fast, responsive, and easy to use.

Re: Text-only CNN

#100
post #3

EDIT: As I wrote this, someone deployed a server-side rendered version of the site. Now the site is perfect. :) This site appears to load ~350 KB of JavaScript, which I think is a bit excessive for a "lite" text-only site. From the sourcemaps, I found a long list of libraries, including: * react * redux * redux-thunk * react-router * axios * base64-js (why not window.atob/btoa?) * core-js * fbjs * react-hot-loader (s…

FWIW, base64-js and similar libraries are still needed (though probably not in this case...) because window.btoa() only works on latin1 ASCII strings. Try giving it some arbitrary UTF-8:

btoa("\ud83d\ude0b") -> Uncaught DOMException: Failed to execute 'btoa' on 'Window': The string to be encoded contains characters outside of the Latin1 range.

(Edit: apparently HN doesn't either; changed to \u...)

Post reply on HN