Live data from Hacker News

RSS Still Beats Facebook and Twitter for Tracking News

fieldguide.gizmodo.com

41–50 of 98 posts

Re: RSS Still Beats Facebook and Twitter for Tracking News

#41
post #30

RSS gives the user maximum control - but it lacks the social features. What we need is a way to connect our RSS feeds together.

"What we need is a way to connect our RSS feeds together." Could you flesh this out a little? What is it that you want to see?

I would like to publish an output from my reading as RSS channels - then other people could subscribe to those channels making a full circle. I don't know what these channels would be - we could start with simple 'liked articles', then readers would count in how many 'liked channels' from friends a given article is and do other heuristics. But everybody would be able to make his own channels and then observe if people subscribe to them. In general it would be like a Facebook feed - but the algorithm would be executed on the user machine and defined by him.

Re: RSS Still Beats Facebook and Twitter for Tracking News

#42

Indeed. But Facebook and Twitter beat RSS for tracking users. edit: > Perhaps most importantly, you don’t need to be constantly online and constantly refreshing your feeds to make sure you don’t miss anything. That's misleading. If you are using a desktop client then you might miss items from a very active feed if it didn't connect to the web recently enough. That was (to me) the biggest selling point of Google Reade…

There are plenty of alternatives to Google Reader around.

I use NewsBlur.

Re: RSS Still Beats Facebook and Twitter for Tracking News

#43
post #38
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> hard news > The BBC Have you visited the BBC News website recently? They even have Daily Mail style headlines now, where a random word is capitalised for emphasis: "Up to NINE terrible things happened" I browse with an ad blocker, so those are actual headlines, not Outbrain/Taboola (ugh) links.

I recall 10 years ago it wasn’t nearly as terrible. Did something happen to the bbc?

> 10 years ago

And this right here folks is why you shouldn't care for people's opinions on the internet.

Re: RSS Still Beats Facebook and Twitter for Tracking News

#44

I highly recommend Inoreader. It works almost exactly like Google Reader, but with extra enhancements like filtering feeds and following Twitter accounts as feeds.

I had to choose a replacement after Google Reader ended, and I chose the one with the best mobile app because I go back and forth a lot between laptop and cellphone. Inoreader it was!

BTW my list of crypto/security blogs I follow: https://github.com/mimoo/crypto_blogs

Re: RSS Still Beats Facebook and Twitter for Tracking News

#45

Indeed. But Facebook and Twitter beat RSS for tracking users. edit: > Perhaps most importantly, you don’t need to be constantly online and constantly refreshing your feeds to make sure you don’t miss anything. That's misleading. If you are using a desktop client then you might miss items from a very active feed if it didn't connect to the web recently enough. That was (to me) the biggest selling point of Google Reade…

There are plenty of alternatives to Google Reader around. I use NewsBlur.

Another one is Bazqux.

Horrible name, but great little product: fast, stable, no nonsense and cheap ($19/year). Using it daily for years and haven't seen single outage or any problem.

Re: RSS Still Beats Facebook and Twitter for Tracking News

#46
I am not the developer behind it, but I want to advertise it: http://fetchrss.com/ is awesome.

I can fetch stuff from public Facebook pages I need (without having a fb account) and create a RSS feed of them. Then with ifttt.com I send updates to my mailbox: awesome.

Also, fuck Facebook and long live RSS and the open web.

Re: RSS Still Beats Facebook and Twitter for Tracking News

#47
post #3

And this is why I run datente.com And why I use RSS to drive a channel on Telegram Agree with the item or not, whatever pops up next is next from wherever you've subscribed It's great

and you don't need to download 15mb of garbage to read a few kb of news

That's a very good point!

Re: RSS Still Beats Facebook and Twitter for Tracking News

#48
I like RSS and use it daily, however the main drawback is a lot of sites tend to truncate their articles and have a "read more" link.

Not so useful when you're in an offline environment like the London underground (where I usually catch up with my feeds at the end of the day)

Facebook and Twitter suffer from the same issue though

Re: RSS Still Beats Facebook and Twitter for Tracking News

#49
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"What we need is a way to connect our RSS feeds together." Could you flesh this out a little? What is it that you want to see?

I would like to publish an output from my reading as RSS channels - then other people could subscribe to those channels making a full circle. I don't know what these channels would be - we could start with simple 'liked articles', then readers would count in how many 'liked channels' from friends a given article is and do other heuristics. But everybody would be able to make his own channels and then observe if peopl…

Tiny tiny RSS allows you to do that... Although without subscriber count.

Re: RSS Still Beats Facebook and Twitter for Tracking News

#50
post #36
post #9

Most of the sources of hard news have RSS feeds. Reuters. The BBC. The New York Times. The Hill. National Weather Service. These are all crap-free. No ads. No "10 ways to waste your time and money". Just news. I have an Model 14 Teletype tape printer from 1926 in a brass and glass case hooked up to the Reuters RSS feed. I've had this at steampunk conventions, and it usually lives in my living room. Push a button and…

That sounds like an awesome project to hack together. I look forward to making something similar one weekend.

Rebuilding a teletype properly is going to probably take you more than one weekend.
Post reply on HN