IPv10
tools.ietf.org
IPv10
1–10 of 132 posts
Re: IPv10
#2Re: IPv10
#3Why not IPv16 and fix the problem for ever?
Situation: There are 14 competing standards
"14?! Ridiculous! We need to develop one universal standard that covers everyone's use cases." "Yeah!"
Situation: There are 15 competing standards
Re: IPv10
#4Why not IPv16 and fix the problem for ever?
Re: IPv10
#5Why not IPv16 and fix the problem for ever?
Re: IPv10
#6Re: IPv10
#7Why V10. Because 4+6?
"IPv10 allows hosts from two IP versions (IPv4 and IPv6) to be able to communicate, and this can be accomplished by having an IPv10 packet containing a mixture of IPv4 and IPv6 addresses in the same IP packet header."
Re: IPv10
#8Why V10. Because 4+6?
Yes: "IPv10 allows hosts from two IP versions (IPv4 and IPv6) to be able to communicate, and this can be accomplished by having an IPv10 packet containing a mixture of IPv4 and IPv6 addresses in the same IP packet header."
Re: IPv10
#9Why V10. Because 4+6?
Re: IPv10
#10Suddenly want to increase the domain from 2^55 to something much higher? Use a 15-byte address where the first 15 bits are 1s and the 16th bit is 0. The rest of the (15*8 - 16 = 104) bits are available.
You get the point - we can arbitrarily increase the size without giving up flexibility.
What's the drawback if we use something like this? Routing troubles? Speed?
Alternative method: the addresses can be as many bits as required, but every bit index that's a multiple of 8 must be 1. The last byte is signified by a byte having 0 at index 0. Basically:
[1]1010110 [1]0001111 [0]1101011
^ last byte