The Cryptocurrency Singularity
medium.com
The Cryptocurrency Singularity
1–10 of 90 posts
Re: The Cryptocurrency Singularity
#2Re: The Cryptocurrency Singularity
#3Completely agree. Thanks for bringing Gresham's Law into it. Now I'm terrified I need to diversify.
Re: The Cryptocurrency Singularity
#4Re: The Cryptocurrency Singularity
#5Then this:
> When the singularity is reached, I think people will be more likely to choose to spend their inflationary fiat currency instead of their deflationary cryptocurrency.
I'm lost here. People already prefer to spend USD over Bitcoin. So I understand the change would be if Bitcoin inflates faster, because then people will prefer to spend Bitcoin. But the article sais the opposite.
Or doesn't "stable against USD" mean that Bitcoin will inflate/deflat at around the same rate as USD?
Interesting article, I'd love to understand it! Anyone?
Re: The Cryptocurrency Singularity
#6"You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete."
IMHO this is what Bitcoin is all about. Not a get-rich-quick scheme or whatever insults some people throw at it, but a sound, arguably better alternative to fiat currencies.
Aside: If you haven't yet gotten into the fancy dancy, drama sprinkled ICO, Scamcoin, and Altcoin world I cannot recommend it enough. It's hilarious, like the cambrian explosion of cryptomoney.
Re: The Cryptocurrency Singularity
#7rofl
If you want people to use currency more, you make it inflate faster. This guy does not understand macroeconomics.
Re: The Cryptocurrency Singularity
#8There are other reasons, also, why Bitcoin or it's ilk would be particularly bad commodities to show this effect- notably, that the Bitcoin system can handle only a finite volume of transactions efficiently, and while it's capacity can be increased, the community managing it is (so far) still too disorganized to do so quickly (and without dramatic measures like forks and such.) Gold trading, as far as I know, already has none of these limitations, so cryptocurrencies have catching up to do, on that front.
Re: The Cryptocurrency Singularity
#9Inflation is bad, but so is deflation because it encourages saving your money which, in turn, hurts liquidity in the marketplace (i.e. the amount of cash freely flowing around). Liquidity is essential to keep the economy moving.
Isn't what we want really a currency with just a little bit of inflation that keeps people spending their dollars today rather than saving them for tomorrow?
Re: The Cryptocurrency Singularity
#10I'm confused. Gresham's law sais "bad money drives out good". Inflation is bad, so from that follows that the money that inflates more will be more used. Okay, I buy that. Then this: > When the singularity is reached, I think people will be more likely to choose to spend their inflationary fiat currency instead of their deflationary cryptocurrency. I'm lost here. People already prefer to spend USD over Bitcoin. So I…
Bitcoin is going up in value, and according to the market predictions it will go way higher, so it's deflationary.
Bitcoin holders will prefer to spend cash money to bitcoins anytime in speculation of future gains.
I see bitcoin more of a speculative investment at the moment, than a type of currency. Only the ones that are riding the bitcoin trains seems to think this is the future of money. Outside that bubble nobody really uses it.