Choose boring employees

"Access to developer talent" is a reasonable factor in selecting a tech stack (e.g. there's a reason few use COBOL, etc.) But it's one of MANY factors.

Re: Choose boring employees

#6

Post by [deleted] » Tue, Sep 05, 2017, 10:41 PM UTC

iffycan wrote: post #3

milesokeefe wrote: post #2

Title should read "employees".

Though the typo'd version probably has some merit, too.

[deleted]

Re: Choose boring employees

#7

Post by jonbarker » Tue, Sep 05, 2017, 10:42 PM UTC

If boring == profitable, sign me up!

Re: Choose boring employees

#8

Post by gtt » Tue, Sep 05, 2017, 10:45 PM UTC

jonbarker wrote: post #7

If boring == profitable, sign me up!

Sadly, usually boring is just boring.

Re: Choose boring employees

#9

Post by StavrosK » Tue, Sep 05, 2017, 10:45 PM UTC

This article is three lines long. What's next for the front page? Tweets?

Re: Choose boring employees

#10

Post by nulagrithom » Tue, Sep 05, 2017, 10:47 PM UTC

Ugh, I hate this sentiment. "Technology moves too fast so don't bother trying to keep up!" No... It's about balance...

We're looking for a Synon 2/E expert right now. It's going about as well as you'd expect.