Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Question however: is there a leader on the planet that has a greater, almost intuitive sense about threats to their position of power than Putin? Who would that be? Kim Jung-un?
Maybe his father. It's a little early to see if he's a long-term survivor. In the scheme of things, he's an authoritarian infant. Not to mention, North Korea is more likely being operated by a military cabal right now than by Kim Jong-un.
Putin: Leader in artificial intelligence will rule world
51–60 of 69 posts
Re: Putin: Leader in artificial intelligence will rule world
#52Don't get me wrong, I fully subscribe to the school of thought that he's a murderer, but honestly, drones fighting drones sounds pretty good.
It terms of life saved, I totally agree. In terms of social progress, this causes a big problem: military power, until now, depended in big parts on having military people on your side. So sure, they can be corrupt, swayed by a more or less evil ideology or just plain racist, but in order to be a leader, you needed to at least satisfy a big group of people. And it was easier if it were the majority. Automated warfare…
Re: Putin: Leader in artificial intelligence will rule world
#53In another piece of news: China to add AI courses in primary education https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15154289 Where does the US stand? Any serious plans by its leaders and the government?
For more than half a century, the best and brightest minds in the world have come to America. Bret Stephens put it best:
>As for Nobelists, a report by George Mason’s Institute for Immigration Research found that Americans have won 40 percent of all Nobel Prizes ever awarded — and immigrants accounted for 35 percent of those winners. Last year, the only native-born American to win the prize was Bob Dylan, for literature. The rest of the American winners — economist Oliver Hart, physicist J. Michael Kosterlitz, chemist Fraser Stoddart — are immigrants.
>A common American conceit is that we attract brilliant foreigners because we have brilliant things: great universities, vast financial resources, a dynamic economy, high-tech. That gets things mostly backward. It’s because we have brilliant foreigners that we have those things in the first place. Google. Comcast. eBay. Kraft. Pfizer. AT&T. They all had immigrants as founders.
>Overall, a 2016 study by the Partnership for the New American Economy found that 40 percent of all Fortune 500 companies were founded or co-founded by immigrants or the children of immigrants. Taken together they employed 19 million people and had revenues of $4.8 trillion.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/01/opinion/daca-trump-dreame...
The United States will be the leader in all major technological advancements for the conceivable future, because there is more genius in the United States than there is in the rest of the world combined. There has never, in human history, been a nation so adept at attracting the best and brightest minds from the far reaches of the globe.
No other country comes close to possessing the capacity for invention and sheer brilliance that the US does.
Re: Putin: Leader in artificial intelligence will rule world
#54In another piece of news: China to add AI courses in primary education https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15154289 Where does the US stand? Any serious plans by its leaders and the government?
Oh goodness, please do not make courses mandatory. China adding AI courses to their primary education means their students will hate it.
Re: Putin: Leader in artificial intelligence will rule world
#55Artificial intelligence == ML/CV/NLP (not the AGI) will transform the world over the next two decades. People vastly underestimate importance of recent advances in detection/recognition/NLU tasks. Sure it sounds boring by some sci-fi standards but when it comes to warfare ability to deploy cheap drones that can do near real time enemy identification will transform not just the battelfield but the entire society. Look…
I might believe in the advent of AI once my phone alarm disables itself instead of ringing when I have been travelling at 75miles per hour for 30 minutes, obviously awake and going to work.
What does this have to do with AI. In fact having an alarm that randomly gets disbabled is Stupid design.
Re: Putin: Leader in artificial intelligence will rule world
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
I might believe in the advent of AI once my phone alarm disables itself instead of ringing when I have been travelling at 75miles per hour for 30 minutes, obviously awake and going to work.
Unless you are traveling in subway/Uber/Car-pool/commuter-rail and catching a quick nap. What does this have to do with AI. In fact having an alarm that randomly gets disbabled is Stupid design.
Re: Putin: Leader in artificial intelligence will rule world
#57Dude is 64 years old, and was never seen using a computer. Give him a break on this one, he's likely just parroting Medvedev, who in turn is parroting one of his distant underlings.
> Dude is 64 years old, and was never seen using a computer. Putin became acting president of Russian Federation on New Years Eve 1999. In months since, the only thing he brought into Yeltsin's former office was a computer[1]. He may not be a digital native, but to underestimate him is a mistake. [1] https://youtu.be/EjU8Fg3NFmo?t=3m10s
Re: Putin: Leader in artificial intelligence will rule world
#58Re: Putin: Leader in artificial intelligence will rule world
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Dude is 64 years old, and was never seen using a computer. Putin became acting president of Russian Federation on New Years Eve 1999. In months since, the only thing he brought into Yeltsin's former office was a computer[1]. He may not be a digital native, but to underestimate him is a mistake. [1] https://youtu.be/EjU8Fg3NFmo?t=3m10s
Immediately after that point in the video he says he doesn't know anything about it.