Live data from Hacker News

US government halts study on health effects of coal mining

nature.com

1–10 of 97 posts

Re: US government halts study on health effects of coal mining

#2
"But think of the freedom of speech!"

In all seriousness though, the most important bit wasn't even clarified by the article:

The agency says it is reviewing spending on all projects that cost more than $100,000.

So is it actually true and I'm supposed to be manipulated into outrage due to cherry picking this one project? Or is it false and I'm supposed to be actually outraged at this shadowy deceitful action?

Re: US government halts study on health effects of coal mining

#3
post #2

"But think of the freedom of speech!" In all seriousness though, the most important bit wasn't even clarified by the article: The agency says it is reviewing spending on all projects that cost more than $100,000. So is it actually true and I'm supposed to be manipulated into outrage due to cherry picking this one project? Or is it false and I'm supposed to be actually outraged at this shadowy deceitful action?

I don't know, can you think for yourself and decide whether the issue is important to you or not?

Re: US government halts study on health effects of coal mining

#10
post #8

I assumed it was widely known that coal mining was hazardous to ones health. My grandfather died from black lung before I was born.

This study is on the health risks of surface coal mining (also known as mountaintop removal) on the surrounding communities, not on the miners. As the article notes there is some evidence of unusually high lung cancer and birth defect rates in communities near such mines.
Post reply on HN