Live data from Hacker News

New t-shirt sewing robot can make as many shirts per hour as 17 factory workers

qz.com

91–95 of 95 posts

Re: New t-shirt sewing robot can make as many shirts per hour as 17 factory workers

#91
post #85
post #2

$0.33 per shirt, anywhere in the world, is nearly as cheap as the cheapest sweatshop markets. I expect most commentary will look at this using a US vs China thing, but I'm more worried about SE Asia and Africa. They need to climb up the development ladder that China's already 1/2-way up. Say what you will about clothing and sneaker sweatshops, but they were a tried and tested method for building up the basics of an i…

considering the low price of the shirts, how do you cover the capital costs of the robots? I'm having a hard time imagining the robots putting out 6 digits-worth of shirts per robot to cover the costs?

Perhaps they can focus on customization, and sell more expensive shirts?

Re: New t-shirt sewing robot can make as many shirts per hour as 17 factory workers

#92

Oh, boy, another series of layoffs and the rich getting richer. "But my free market!!" Means squat when the elite hoards all the goods and the barriers to entry are extremely high.

So... Communism? 100$ shirts? Sweatshops? Ludditism? Also there is no free market anymore - have you seen all the punitive economic sanctions recently.

Re: New t-shirt sewing robot can make as many shirts per hour as 17 factory workers

#93
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> [...] semi-disposable consumer goods. Because technology got better. In my humble opinion this is the flawed assumption in the line of thought you advance. Technology isn't universally disposable, that depends on the replacability and support structure around any specific source of complexity (edit: and purchasing power) You haven't solved much of anything with automation if the final word is "don't worry how it wo…

> You haven't solved much of anything with automation if the final word is "don't worry how it works, we'll come over and bill you to fix it" Odd, because that's how almost all "automation" in everyday life works. How many people actually understand the operation of, or could fix, their dishwashers? Their cars? Even their coffee-makers? Yet dishes are washed, cars are driven and coffee is made, mostly uneventfully. I…

I recognise the truth in what you say. We both apparently live in areas where we can afford to ring up the repair guy for fixing or replacemement.

Why you assume that is universally true is beyond me though. How do you expect societies that are incapable of adequately maintaining roads or developing safe architecture to house their population to sprout the mentality and savoir-faire for complex operations?

For sure my argument is not universal either, but I believe you transpose properties you are familiar with to a world you are not.

Re: New t-shirt sewing robot can make as many shirts per hour as 17 factory workers

#94

$0.33 for the robot to produce the shirt vs $0.20 or so for the sweatshop worker in bangladesh. Take into account the extra shipping costs from bangladesh and it might actually be cheaper

Agreed, and you are also forgetting about speed. This robot can produce t-shirts that can be delivered to customers next day. Doesn't matter how cheep bangladesh might be, they can't match that speed. This opens up opportunities for sales that were impossible before. If you need 100 shirts tomorrow you are willing to pay more so it has even larger margins.

Re: New t-shirt sewing robot can make as many shirts per hour as 17 factory workers

#95
post #2

$0.33 per shirt, anywhere in the world, is nearly as cheap as the cheapest sweatshop markets. I expect most commentary will look at this using a US vs China thing, but I'm more worried about SE Asia and Africa. They need to climb up the development ladder that China's already 1/2-way up. Say what you will about clothing and sneaker sweatshops, but they were a tried and tested method for building up the basics of an i…

Well we could react to abundance in a non-imperialist way...
Post reply on HN