Live data from Hacker News

Increasing numbers of wingsuit jumpers are dying (2016)

nationalgeographic.com

171–180 of 275 posts

Re: Increasing numbers of wingsuit jumpers are dying (2016)

#171
post #89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Why should it be? Because someone one has to clean up the mess . And it wastes the coroners time. I'm not saying I agree that it should be banned, but those seem like two obvious angles.

Valid concerns, sure. But how is banning it a good solution? How do you even enforce a ban on a group of people who are okay risking their lives for fun? Maybe instead you get them contributing to a local SAR organization. Maybe they have to get insurance. Or something else more constructive and less ham-fisted than just making it illegal. Why is banning stuff so high on everyone's list of solutions to problems that…

> problems that don't really affect them?

Perhaps because:

> And it wastes the coroners time.

means it does affect them (the tax payers)?

Personally, I think as few things as possible should be banned/restricted. If things directly impact other peoples lives, then sure, but if its indirect or minimal, then perhaps not. Its a difficult balance though (but in general, I'm in the "the less government involvement in the peoples lives the better" camp).

Re: Increasing numbers of wingsuit jumpers are dying (2016)

#172
post #94
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> There's gotta be safer ways to get an adrenaline rush. I was suprised to see no mention of VR as a potential alternative anywhere in the thread. I suppose realism still has a long way to go!

I doubt VR will ever replace dangerous sports. You get adrenaline rush precisely for the fact that you realize it's dangerous with a real potential of getting killed or wounded and the fact that you get away with it. Sitting in an armchair with no such potential consequences might get you some thrills but it's nowhere close to the real adrenaline rush. I don't actively pursuit this feeling, but driving motorcycle reg…

I love VR car racing, and it's way cheaper when I make a mistake and spin or go into a wall, but it's just not the same as an actual track day (not racing, just a standard "high performance driving event") in my boring daily driver. I'm not sure it will ever be.

Re: Increasing numbers of wingsuit jumpers are dying (2016)

#173

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Perhaps for the same reasons certain people are attracted to service in the military. Some people report getting a massive kick out of participating in active armed combat situations, to the point that civilian life seems dull in comparison.

You get a comparable kick playing paintball (not woodsball) or laser tag without killing anyone.

Not sure. The knowledge of fake risk ("you're being shot at, yes, but it's just paint-filled balls - painful yet nonlethal") diminishes the fight-or-flight reaction.

Re: Increasing numbers of wingsuit jumpers are dying (2016)

#174
post #87
post #24

Extreme sports like this just feel so dumb. Why are you risking your life for a momentary thrill? You'd get a better rush and be safer taking heroin.

They are called adrenaline junkies for a reason. That makes me wonder - can we put thrill-seeker in "rehab"? And should we?

"We" who? Is rehab effective if nonvoluntary? (Available data seems to say "no")

Re: Increasing numbers of wingsuit jumpers are dying (2016)

#175

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's nothing valid about it, it's a misspelling and a grammatical mistake.

It's language evolving. When the misspellings/misinterpretations of "a napron" and "an eekname" became common enough we got "an apron" and "a nickname". If anyone — especially native speakers and others with a high degree of mastery of English — claims to have difficulty understanding "I'd of stayed home" then they're most likely being deliberately obtuse or needlessly contrarian.

I'd hate to loose a common language standard, though.

Re: Increasing numbers of wingsuit jumpers are dying (2016)

#176
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why should it be? It's not like poeple don't understand the risk - especially by the time they get to the point where they can actually do it. What about all the other 'extreme' sports where death and/or serious injury is a possible outcome?

> Why should it be? Because someone one has to clean up the mess . And it wastes the coroners time. I'm not saying I agree that it should be banned, but those seem like two obvious angles.

I agree on someone cleaning up the mess. But surely this is a pretty easy case for the coroner?

Re: Increasing numbers of wingsuit jumpers are dying (2016)

#177
Active BASE jumper and wingsuit pilot here. Instructor of both.

2016 was by far and away our worst year on record. We lost newbies, heros, and damn near all levels in between. Since then, a few sites have taken a more locked-down approach where we used to be welcome, and as a community we've made progress to band together to push education and conservative decision making over 'dude that was so sketchy.'

A lot of people have brought up the why - why do people do this when they know it's so dangerous? Well, that's a question that everyone needs to make for themselves, but for me it's quite simply that it's the only time I've found my mind to be quiet. It forces me to be present, assess everything in a level of detail that is unparalleled in any other time in my life, and quiet down every other distraction.

Also, it's beautiful. Being in the mountains, on top of buildings, out on bridges, climbing antennae, all with some of your closest friends? It's incredible. There's absolutely nothing on the planet like that level of adventure.

With all that said, it's fucking dangerous. I've managed to have a somewhat clean track record in my two years in the sport, with only two broken bones, but I have probably 20 of the people on the Base Fatality List still in my phone, four of whom I'd call great friends. It's fucking awful losing friends like that, but it's who we are. If they wouldn't have lived a life like this, would they have been them?

A little while back I had the lightning strike closest to my family, when we lost Ian. Here's his story:

https://vimeo.com/167054481

Re: Increasing numbers of wingsuit jumpers are dying (2016)

#178

Proximity flying is just inherently dangerous. Even with power, many people have died. Sparky Imeson, who wrote the "bible" of mountain flying, died from flying too close to terrain. The strange thing is that he was actually flying back to somewhere that he had had an accident in the past (the first time he just got seriously injured, the second time he died). If you look at the accident location, there is a valley a…

I was flying a kite on a wide open beach the other day. With the constant sea-to-land wind it was a piece of cake, once the kite was above 20ft it just stayed up.

However the next day, somehow the airflow was much more turbulent. I would get the kite a good 100 ft up and still, suddenly a particular vortex would flip it upside down and slam it into the ground. Made me think exactly about this kind of activity and how risky it must be.

Re: Increasing numbers of wingsuit jumpers are dying (2016)

#179
post #163

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've heard that skydiving triggers this experience at some point. The first time it's frightening. The second to fourth time it gives you an adrenaline rush. The fifth time suddenly you think "holy shit, what am I doing?" At least, that's what a friend told me.

Skydiving is actually a very safe and low-risk 'adrenaline' activity, from what I've heard. There are multiple redundancies and you are almost never at the mercy of randomness like with winsuits, climbing, or whitewater rapids. The deaths that do occur are almost always from experienced jumpers that not following recommended safety processes, often in the pursuit of pushing things to the edge. The point is that unlik…

> Skydiving is actually a very safe and low-risk 'adrenaline' activity, from what I've heard

I'm sorry, but you've heard wrong. Skydiving is super dangerous, relative to other sports. Less than wingsuit flying, but more death per participant than most other sports.

There's an unfortunate infographic that's made the rounds that makes skydiving look relatively as dangerous as football, but they made a mistake with the numbers and left people with an incorrect and extremely misleading impression. A lot of people are now saying that skydiving is "as safe" or "safer" than football, and that is flat out false. I hope nobody is motivated to skydive thinking it's super safe, because it's not.

> There are multiple redundancies and you are almost never at the mercy of randomness like with winsuits

For a single jumper, there's one redundancy - a spare chute - and they fail and/or tangle at about the rate of 1 in 800 jumps, from what I recall.

For a BASE jumper, there's no redundancy, they don't normally have a spare.

Almost everyone who jumps more than a few times does formation jumping or other group activities, if not get into BASE or wingsuit. Formation jumps put you at the mercy of other people, which are less controllable than mountains or trees. I stopped formation jumping after a couple of bad ones where I had close calls that were other people's mistakes.

Most of the people I knew during my time skydiving are now dead, more than a dozen people.

Re: Increasing numbers of wingsuit jumpers are dying (2016)

#180

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How are there so many people willing to do something so insanely stupid? I looked at the BASE fatality list. Vast majority of the names and nationalities are of European descent and/or nationality. Are adventure sports (risk taking for thrill) a white European thing? Do you have to have a sort of arrogance and privilege to disrespect risks like this? I personally have no desire for any of this stuff, as I'm quite awa…

It costs a lot of money to get into.

It does, and most BASE jumpers that I know / have met / have taught are in their earlY 30's.
Post reply on HN