Clickbaity title. Original: Environmental impacts of food consumption by dogs and cats Anyway,it's not like the article seems like being a particularly good one, while it cites the concept that meat fed to pets is (largely) not suitable for human consumption, doesn't take into account the actual related impact and vaguely talks of post-processing the non-suitable parts. The IMHO terrible part is this one: >And much p…
Environmental impacts of food consumption by dogs and cats
41–50 of 95 posts
Re: Environmental impacts of food consumption by dogs and cats
#42Re: Environmental impacts of food consumption by dogs and cats
#43Re: Environmental impacts of food consumption by dogs and cats
#44-1 No need to bring Americans' weight into it!
Re: Environmental impacts of food consumption by dogs and cats
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
>> Your cat and/or dog is probably too fat Slightly above 50% of US pet dogs and cats are overweight.
So, on average, they're in better shape than their owners. https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/health-statisti...
Re: Environmental impacts of food consumption by dogs and cats
#46So the big question is, why do some many keep dogs? Is it mostly loneliness? If so, should we build towns that makes people less lonely?
Re: Environmental impacts of food consumption by dogs and cats
#47My dogs get human grade food. None of this 'maybe good enough for people' stuff. They get real meat and vegetables that are in a recognizable form. They also don't get table scraps. This means my dogs aren't eating dodgy Chinese proteins, and also aren't fat (you may have noticed but most of the food we eat here in the US is terrible for us).
Re: Environmental impacts of food consumption by dogs and cats
#48My dogs get human grade food. None of this 'maybe good enough for people' stuff. They get real meat and vegetables that are in a recognizable form. They also don't get table scraps. This means my dogs aren't eating dodgy Chinese proteins, and also aren't fat (you may have noticed but most of the food we eat here in the US is terrible for us).
Re: Environmental impacts of food consumption by dogs and cats
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
One thing that can help a lot is to give dogs and cats more vegetables. In particular, they love brassicas, especially brussels sprouts and broccoli. Either mixed in with their regular food or as a treat, it helps fill them up with very few calories - and really good for them too. If you haven't tried this, I recommend it. Simply microwave some brussels sprouts or broccoli until tender, let cool, and either chop it u…
Dogs yeah, they're omnivores as far as I understand. Cats though are straight up carnivore, and while they might enjoy the taste of some veggies, and some stuff can help with their digestion, they don't really get much nutrients out of vegetables, and a large portion of veggies are downright harmful to them.
Re: Environmental impacts of food consumption by dogs and cats
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
> meat fed to pets is (largely) not suitable for human consumption 30% unsuitable for human consumption? This choosiness is a just one more sign of affluence and one of the habits we have to get rid of if we want to improve our ecological footprint. Go to a rural village in a developing country and you will see them using 95% easily. This is just
The choosiness is also culture-dependent. I have eaten pig feet, pig stomach, shark fin, unidentifiable organs and very bony meat at somewhat upscale restaurants in China. I'm sure there are some foods that are seen as basically inedible in China, but those do not necessarily coincide with Western tastes. A lot of this is probably influenced by perceptions of "poor-people food" (like lobster) instead of being based i…
Since when is lobster considered a "poor-people food"? That is the exact impression I get when it's the most expensive entree on most menus.