Node is for nazis!
Nvm will **not** be adding support for Ayo.js
11–16 of 16 posts
Re: Nvm will **not** be adding support for Ayo.js
#12Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://github.com/nodejs/CTC/issues/165 I assume that they forked because they don't believe Rod should be on the node leadership teams.
I must say that he has represented and defended himself very well here, and as a newcomer to this issue I am impressed with his analysis. However if it was possible to turn against him for what I understand to be such small accusations, such as simply disagreeing with one usage of CoCs in a particular setting, how might the project deal with a member who argues against code of conducts in general? Or how about the No…
People have questions, and if they can ask them tactfully and diplomatically, they should not be eviscerated for "being on the wrong side of the debate." Whichever side is doing the eviscerating. There are two sides to a debate, otherwise it is some kind of fascism where there can be only one side.
(Unless one side says the other side is sub-human! Then they are wrong, and you should not listen. I only say this because, I do read the news and it looks like one really has to say this today to avoid being misunderstood. But taking that position, to me, would be an example of jumping the shark. I'm almost sure that's not what is happening here. I'm happy to listen if someone has more information.)
Ninja edit: I read the link to find out the story, and I don't specifically know any more than I knew when I started writing above. I believe that I have seen "this" before, though. It looks like "this" is a witch-hunt. But all of the context has evidently been removed so that outsiders don't see a biased view. So I guess I can't really know what this is about! Does this mean all views are biased?
Re: Nvm will **not** be adding support for Ayo.js
#13I'd still reach for nvm for deploying to a server. To the best of my knowledge, the code is portable across all UNIX-y OSs.
On the other hand, asdf supports multiple languages, so I was able to kill off rvm too! It also has considerably better performance (specifically, startup speed).
EDIT: As to the discussion regarding Ayo.js... I've never interacted with Rod personally, but having read a few hundred of his miscellaneous responses on GitHub, he has never struck me as someone unreasonable. His response to the criticisms being raised seem very reasonable as well. If anything, I now feel like I have a bit more trust on node team.
Based on my highly limited outsider's perspective, trying to kick him seems overly harsh. If people believe he's doing things poorly, an avenue should be created through which constructive criticism and feedback can be provided. We're all human, we make mistakes, and we sometimes don't understand each facet of problems we encounter.
Re: Nvm will **not** be adding support for Ayo.js
#14Re: Nvm will **not** be adding support for Ayo.js
#15https://github.com/creationix/nvm/issues/1595#issuecomment-3...
Re: Nvm will **not** be adding support for Ayo.js
#16Oh no... what ever will all the memers and dreamers over at github.com/ayojs do with their political science project now. From the makers of cringeworthy tumblrs, tune in next quarter for the next embarrassing episode of the hit millenial sitcom, "Are we enterprise yet?: The node.js/npm.js story",