Live data from Hacker News

Catching the Great American Eclipse at 35,000 Feet

blog.alaskaair.com

111–120 of 124 posts

Re: Catching the Great American Eclipse at 35,000 Feet

#111

Here is a picture I took after messing with the aperture and having quite a long lense https://i.stack.imgur.com/YvyJB.jpg from Robinsville NC. I swear you can see stars in there but could be wrong.

There's definitely some stars in there :)

http://i.imgur.com/undefined.jpg

I'd like to see what you can come up with doing this on the original file!

Re: Catching the Great American Eclipse at 35,000 Feet

#112

another cool one is the 70's one using the Concorde: https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/8q8qwk/the-concor...

So anyone observing totality in that region would have perhaps seen (and heard) the Concorde in front of the eclipse?

Re: Catching the Great American Eclipse at 35,000 Feet

#113
post #110
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Based on sokoloff's source, it looks to be a bit under $50k in total cost (to the airline). If you want to run that number by your friends for a 4.75 hr flight in a 737-900ER, it'd be nice to get confirmation. PS: You lucky dog. I've been debating going for my pilot's license.

About $3750/hr. There is also ownership costs which are about $3500/day. By the way, flying small planes is more fun. With the larger planes, I've been expected to mostly keep it going the right direction. In the smaller prop jobs, my friends don't much care so long as I don't bump into anything. You don't need a license to pilot the plane. A licensed pilot can let you take the controls. Just hit up your nearest regi…

Thanks! That's kind of inline with the numbers above after they were clarified, ex ownership costs.

And noted. I may see if I can get a flight. My long term dream is to acquire float plane.

Re: Catching the Great American Eclipse at 35,000 Feet

#114
post #113
post #110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

About $3750/hr. There is also ownership costs which are about $3500/day. By the way, flying small planes is more fun. With the larger planes, I've been expected to mostly keep it going the right direction. In the smaller prop jobs, my friends don't much care so long as I don't bump into anything. You don't need a license to pilot the plane. A licensed pilot can let you take the controls. Just hit up your nearest regi…

Thanks! That's kind of inline with the numbers above after they were clarified, ex ownership costs. And noted. I may see if I can get a flight. My long term dream is to acquire float plane.

If you know the pilot and have flown with them a few times, they might let you do both the landing and the takeoff. I've never landed on the water, but I've landed on skis and over-sized tires on the river's shore.

Most pilots I've met are happy to encourage a love of flying. Planes are pretty common here (outside Rangeley, Maine) and I've been encouraged to get one. I probably won't, but I do consider getting my license.

Re: Catching the Great American Eclipse at 35,000 Feet

#115
post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm guessing you have status with them? Almost every airline is great once you have status. Personally, I hate Alaska. I fly ~2/month & avoid Alaska if I can. My wife's family is from Seattle, so sadly, they're unavoidable around the holidays. Some grievances: * Ridiculous fees. Before we were married my wife booked two flights for after we were married. She changed her name & realized that would cause a problem with…

Yeah most of their planes are disgusting and I can't stand their branding. It's such a shame that they acquired Virgin America. I loved that airline. I wish we lived in a world where that acquisition had been the other way around.

Why are their planes "disgusting"? I fly a lot, both short haul and long haul, and I can't see any quality difference (is that what you mean?) between any planes from any carriers. They are all the same. Mind you, there are differences in seat pitch, lack of USB ports and so on, but I would not call any plane more disgusting than any other plane.

Re: Catching the Great American Eclipse at 35,000 Feet

#116
post #86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Where I was watching (the "day tripper" area at Solartown in Madras, Oregon) there was one bright point source reasonably near the Sun which I assume was Mercury [1]. Overall the sky was brighter than I expected, and if there were stars visible there were not many of them. There was also some idiot's drone buzzing above us, with red lights on two of its opposite arms and green lights on the other two arms. [1] or rat…

That was Venus. not Mercury.

It was neither. It was Regulus. Mercury was further away (still relativelly close) and Venus was much further away.

Re: Catching the Great American Eclipse at 35,000 Feet

#117
post #103

Concorde (or the Tu-144) could've kept up with the shadow

They did this on June 30, 1973. While it stayed in totality 10x longer than would have been possible on the ground, it did not stay for the entire path of totality. Look at the umbral velocity - only the bottom of the parabola is obtainable by even a Concorde.

http://xjubier.free.fr/en/site_pages/solar_eclipses/TSE_1973...

Re: Catching the Great American Eclipse at 35,000 Feet

#119
post #52

I was watching the eclipse in Corvallis and, about 10 minutes before totality, a plane jetted around at high altitude and left a contrail[1]. The new cloud, in the otherwise perfectly clear sky, began to drift toward the sun and I thought, "There could be few better symbols of the attitude that some of %0.0001 have to the rest of us than this." Fortunately, even though the contrail did drift over the sun during total…

This photo was right at the beginning of totality and in no way captures what I saw,

It amazes me how inadequate every photo ever taken is compared to actually seeing the eclipse. They just don't capture the beauty of the corona.

Re: Catching the Great American Eclipse at 35,000 Feet

#120
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sat in the back on an Alaska flight to Hawaii and they ran out of food a couple rows before me. Felt like a bad MBA optimization - save $20 on food by under buying at the cost of periodically making a few passenger unhappy for a 5 hour flight.

Any compensation offered?

I assume that wasn't free food he's talking about
Post reply on HN