I curious as to who is using GIMP for serious work. I have tried it numerous time in the past but always end up going back to PS. As of late I been making a switch to Affinity Photo but have always been pulling for GIMP.
GIMP 2.9.6 Released
21–30 of 87 posts
Re: GIMP 2.9.6 Released
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have always advocated for Gimp but people esp designers want to stick to photoshop. Hope they understand the power of this open source
Can GIMP load psd files correctly? I seem to remember that there was some trouble loading psd files, but I don't remember exactly what. Edit to add: I ask because if GIMP cannot handle the de facto standard image file type without too much fiddling, people won't touch it. It is the same problem LibreOffice has, actually.
Re: GIMP 2.9.6 Released
#23I curious as to who is using GIMP for serious work. I have tried it numerous time in the past but always end up going back to PS. As of late I been making a switch to Affinity Photo but have always been pulling for GIMP.
Re: GIMP 2.9.6 Released
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have always advocated for Gimp but people esp designers want to stick to photoshop. Hope they understand the power of this open source
Can GIMP load psd files correctly? I seem to remember that there was some trouble loading psd files, but I don't remember exactly what. Edit to add: I ask because if GIMP cannot handle the de facto standard image file type without too much fiddling, people won't touch it. It is the same problem LibreOffice has, actually.
Re: GIMP 2.9.6 Released
#25Re: GIMP 2.9.6 Released
#26I've been very impressed with Gimp lately - there was a time that it was clunky and crashy, Windows builds were difficult to find, and usually out of date, and I often felt like I was only persevering with it on principle. In recent years though, it's been wholly solid. Was there a change in project leadership, or something - maybe just a new development workflow? I've known plenty of seemingly-moribund projects spri…
[0] http://www.gimpusers.com/forums/gimp-user/14339-hate-the-new...
Re: GIMP 2.9.6 Released
#27As a casual user on a Mac, I've long since abandoned GIMP for Pixelmator + Imagemagick. Has GIMP improved in usability in the past few years?
Feature request filled back in 2012 and still not implemented: http://support.pixelmator.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=8336
Without it working in areas near the edges is very stressful and painful.
Re: GIMP 2.9.6 Released
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can GIMP load psd files correctly? I seem to remember that there was some trouble loading psd files, but I don't remember exactly what. Edit to add: I ask because if GIMP cannot handle the de facto standard image file type without too much fiddling, people won't touch it. It is the same problem LibreOffice has, actually.
The notes OP linked to indicate that there are more fixes included in this version. It is likely what importing a .doc in open office was 10 years ago. It proably works 99% of the time but that 1% will be right before an important deadline or something.
Are you a terrorist
i loved to make this joke and it hurts me that you're downvoting me friends
Re: GIMP 2.9.6 Released
#29Occasionally using it on a Mac. Most of the time I force quit it, though, because it loads fonts forever. It's not a "quickly open and edit a file" tool for me.
Re: GIMP 2.9.6 Released
#30Occasionally using it on a Mac. Most of the time I force quit it, though, because it loads fonts forever. It's not a "quickly open and edit a file" tool for me.