Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'd blame your source code more than Jenkins. Our jenkins instance runs our CI in a couple of minutes.
Not everyone is working on projects that are little more than CRUD webapps. I've worked on code that took hours to compile even on beefy machines.
Spacex Launch Webcast: Formosat-5 Mission
31–40 of 59 posts
Re: Spacex Launch Webcast: Formosat-5 Mission
#32They were supposed to attempt to land/rescue some other part of the rocket this time. There was nothing about it in the webcast.
That'd be the fairing, the 'nosecone' that covers the payload during launch. It wasn't shown in the webcast because it has a low probability of success (they've made several attempts so far with varying degrees of accuracy and damage) and because there's no live feed from the fairing as it descends. The aim is to get it to land in a predetermined spot in the ocean with steerable parafoils, then eventually to stick a…
Re: Spacex Launch Webcast: Formosat-5 Mission
#33They were supposed to attempt to land/rescue some other part of the rocket this time. There was nothing about it in the webcast.
Re: Spacex Launch Webcast: Formosat-5 Mission
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not everyone is working on projects that are little more than CRUD webapps. I've worked on code that took hours to compile even on beefy machines.
I got a 300k line Java app down to seven and a half minutes including unit and functional tests. What are you working with?
Re: Spacex Launch Webcast: Formosat-5 Mission
#35Successful landing on Please read the instructions. 15 consecutive landings
Re: Spacex Launch Webcast: Formosat-5 Mission
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'd blame your source code more than Jenkins. Our jenkins instance runs our CI in a couple of minutes.
Not everyone is working on projects that are little more than CRUD webapps. I've worked on code that took hours to compile even on beefy machines.
Re: Spacex Launch Webcast: Formosat-5 Mission
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
That'd be the fairing, the 'nosecone' that covers the payload during launch. It wasn't shown in the webcast because it has a low probability of success (they've made several attempts so far with varying degrees of accuracy and damage) and because there's no live feed from the fairing as it descends. The aim is to get it to land in a predetermined spot in the ocean with steerable parafoils, then eventually to stick a…
Didn't one of the mars rovers bring its own bouncy castle? Hollywood has since used that in several movies.
Re: Spacex Launch Webcast: Formosat-5 Mission
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
I got a 300k line Java app down to seven and a half minutes including unit and functional tests. What are you working with?
Probably a giant C++ codebase. Our CI runs can take well over an hour. C++ compiles so damn slowly compared to Java.
Re: Spacex Launch Webcast: Formosat-5 Mission
#39Re: Spacex Launch Webcast: Formosat-5 Mission
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
And as always, the live video feed of the landing was clunky :). They should nail one with a steady stream.
Every time I've watched a landing, the video feed is janky. One might speculate that they don't want to live-stream an embarrassing failure but that seems a bit odd when it would be more embarrassing to have an explosion during launch, losing the payload. Edit: vvvv that sounds quite reasonable, you'd think they'd do something like throw a buoy 100m away to house the actual satellite link and just do wifi from the ba…