Live data from Hacker News

Spacex Launch Webcast: Formosat-5 Mission

spacex.com

21–30 of 59 posts

Re: Spacex Launch Webcast: Formosat-5 Mission

#21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It wasn't their best stream, others have been better. The achievement of landing and potentially reducing the cost is enough.

> potentially reducing the cost Aren't we getting close to being safe to assume that this is actually true? They've already re-used a number of boosters. (:

I was playing safe, although i believe it does/will. I don't think they have publicly released prices for reuse and as such i thought it was a little too broad to state as fact.

Re: Spacex Launch Webcast: Formosat-5 Mission

#23
post #7
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And as always, the live video feed of the landing was clunky :). They should nail one with a steady stream.

Every time I've watched a landing, the video feed is janky. One might speculate that they don't want to live-stream an embarrassing failure but that seems a bit odd when it would be more embarrassing to have an explosion during launch, losing the payload. Edit: vvvv that sounds quite reasonable, you'd think they'd do something like throw a buoy 100m away to house the actual satellite link and just do wifi from the ba…

No need for speculation - the feed never cuts out on the return-to-launch-site landings. It's only wonky on the ship landings.

Bouys bounce around a lot - the drone ships have special station-keeping thrusters to stay in place.

Re: Spacex Launch Webcast: Formosat-5 Mission

#25
post #19

Spacex launched a satellite to the space and returned back to earth safely faster than our JenkinsCI builds most of our apps.

I'd blame your source code more than Jenkins. Our jenkins instance runs our CI in a couple of minutes.

Not everyone is working on projects that are little more than CRUD webapps. I've worked on code that took hours to compile even on beefy machines.

Re: Spacex Launch Webcast: Formosat-5 Mission

#26

They were supposed to attempt to land/rescue some other part of the rocket this time. There was nothing about it in the webcast.

That'd be the fairing, the 'nosecone' that covers the payload during launch. It wasn't shown in the webcast because it has a low probability of success (they've made several attempts so far with varying degrees of accuracy and damage) and because there's no live feed from the fairing as it descends.

The aim is to get it to land in a predetermined spot in the ocean with steerable parafoils, then eventually to stick a 'bouncy castle' at that spot to soften the landing.

Re: Spacex Launch Webcast: Formosat-5 Mission

#30

They were supposed to attempt to land/rescue some other part of the rocket this time. There was nothing about it in the webcast.

They've been working on fairing recovery for some time but they likely won't provide coverage until they've got all the parts sorted and can do it successfully.
Post reply on HN