81–90 of 146 posts
Just wondering, is it legal to remake a company's logo (eg instagram)
I don't think there's a simple yes/no answer to that. It fits somewhere between trademark and copyright legally, and probably depends on the degree of similarity.
/rant
I wouldn't call them "beautiful". They're OK. "Cute" maybe. In any case, personally I'd rather wait for other people to call my work beautiful. Seems a bit pompous to self-apply it.
In this case I'd call them really cute.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
OTH if you use their icons from e.g. Bootstrap as they are usually used then users actually recognize them without thinking and the icons actually help users interact with your website - which is the point of the icons anyway! The same goes for classic simple buttons, nav bars color pallets etc - users know them already before they interact with your site. Most of that design work you did to make you site "different"…
> Most of that design work you did to make you site "different" or "beautiful" just made your site less intuitive for a user Don't you think it depends on a lot of factors, not just the use of a different icons? Also I doubt users will have trouble understanding that a lock icon on feather and a lock icon on font awesome have the same meaning.
Of course - it all adds up. The trick is knowing where and when it is worth differentiating.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
So, there are licensing terms, they just aren't additional ones from Feather?
You have fallen into the confusing intersection between trademark and copyright. Files created by Facebook, depicting the trademarked Facebook logo, are copyrighted by Facebook. Files created by Feather, depicting the trademarked Facebook logo, are copyrighted by Feather. If the latter is freely licensed, with no restrictions on use, you may use that image in whatever manner you please. If you use it in a manner that…
It mildly bothers me that the stroke for phone-off is the opposite direction to all the other *-off icons.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Most of that design work you did to make you site "different" or "beautiful" just made your site less intuitive for a user Don't you think it depends on a lot of factors, not just the use of a different icons? Also I doubt users will have trouble understanding that a lock icon on feather and a lock icon on font awesome have the same meaning.
> Don't you think it depends on a lot of factors, not just the use of a different icons? Of course - it all adds up. The trick is knowing where and when it is worth differentiating.
There's a Chrome icon, but no Firefox or Safari or Edge or any other browser. Not even a generic. Can we please stop with the implicit homogenization around Chrome? /rant
There is a reason the set contains a Twitter icon and not a Mastodon icon, a Facebook icon and not a Diaspora* icon, a CodePen icon and not a Dabblet icon, etc. Like it or not, these are the products that the people elected.
There's a Chrome icon, but no Firefox or Safari or Edge or any other browser. Not even a generic. Can we please stop with the implicit homogenization around Chrome? /rant
There's a Chrome icon, but no Firefox or Safari or Edge or any other browser. Not even a generic. Can we please stop with the implicit homogenization around Chrome? /rant
