Anyone with insight on this I read years ago: http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/energy/a11907/is-the... I worry that that if Thorium reactors become very very common because they are thought to be very safe (e.g. behind your house common, as some have bragged), but they turn out to be dangerous...we will have a real problem.
A Thorium-Salt Reactor Has Fired Up for the First Time in Four Decades
61–70 of 170 posts
Re: A Thorium-Salt Reactor Has Fired Up for the First Time in Four Decades
#62Anyone with insight on this I read years ago: http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/energy/a11907/is-the... I worry that that if Thorium reactors become very very common because they are thought to be very safe (e.g. behind your house common, as some have bragged), but they turn out to be dangerous...we will have a real problem.
We have decent electricity grids, if reactors become financially viable, first goal will be to power the grid.
I don't see any profit margin in decentralizing the grid.
Re: A Thorium-Salt Reactor Has Fired Up for the First Time in Four Decades
#63> charged particles traveling faster than the speed of light in water What did I just read?
That phrase can be parsed in two ways
#1: (charged particles traveling faster than the speed of light) in water
#2: charged particles traveling faster than (the speed of light in water)
Re: A Thorium-Salt Reactor Has Fired Up for the First Time in Four Decades
#64> charged particles traveling faster than the speed of light in water What did I just read?
(charged particles traveling faster than) (the speed of light in water)
not this:
(charged particles traveling faster than the speed of light) (in water)
Re: A Thorium-Salt Reactor Has Fired Up for the First Time in Four Decades
#65As far as I know the Chinese are also putting much effort into this type of reactor.
Re: A Thorium-Salt Reactor Has Fired Up for the First Time in Four Decades
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
That phrase can be parsed in two ways
To the downvoters: This is technically correct. #1: (charged particles traveling faster than the speed of light) in water #2: charged particles traveling faster than (the speed of light in water)
Therefore, interpretation #1 doesn't make sense.
Maybe colloquially people refer to the speed of light in vacuum as "the speed of light", but again, that is technically incorrect.
*And more technically there's group and phase velocity which may or may not be equal.
Re: A Thorium-Salt Reactor Has Fired Up for the First Time in Four Decades
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
That phrase can be parsed in two ways
To the downvoters: This is technically correct. #1: (charged particles traveling faster than the speed of light) in water #2: charged particles traveling faster than (the speed of light in water)
Re: A Thorium-Salt Reactor Has Fired Up for the First Time in Four Decades
#68And they have had the plans and motivation to build domestic reactors for the past two decades: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/India%27s_three-stage_nuclear_...
NSG membership keeps getting held up by someone or the other and would provide more energy security for India.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/nuclear-reactor-at-...
Re: A Thorium-Salt Reactor Has Fired Up for the First Time in Four Decades
#69Anyone with insight on this I read years ago: http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/energy/a11907/is-the... I worry that that if Thorium reactors become very very common because they are thought to be very safe (e.g. behind your house common, as some have bragged), but they turn out to be dangerous...we will have a real problem.
I think it's unlikely that we'll want to have people playing with radio active waste in their backyard.. We have decent electricity grids, if reactors become financially viable, first goal will be to power the grid. I don't see any profit margin in decentralizing the grid.
Re: A Thorium-Salt Reactor Has Fired Up for the First Time in Four Decades
#70> charged particles traveling faster than the speed of light in water What did I just read?
Cherenkov Radiation [1]. It's not because the particles are going faster than 300M m/s, but because light in the medium is going less than 300M m/s. The unbreakable "speed of light" is actually, the "speed of light (in a vacuum)". Outside of a vacuum, the light is slowed by the materials it travels through (see prisms, angles of refraction, Snell's Law [2] etc.). But it's still a very special condition when the mediu…
If the blue glow happens in your own eyeballs, you've probably just witnessed your own death sentence.