Sounds like BS. Possibly relevant: Eric S. Raymond: Why Hackers Must Eject the SJWs (2015) http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=6918
Node.js is forked to Ayo.js (pronounced like “IO”)
101–110 of 150 posts
Re: Node.js is forked to Ayo.js (pronounced like “IO”)
#102Re: Node.js is forked to Ayo.js (pronounced like “IO”)
#103There's another reason too; there's a theory going around that there's a sizable pool of potential competent contributors who are currently staying away from the Node.js project (and other projects) because they feel excluded (and this is commonly used as an argument as to why policies need to be changed). This fork is going to show whether that group of people really exists; if it does, then the fork will thrive, but if it does not, then it will die.
I don't think there's much to do about this now other than wait and see it play out. The results of this fork will become obvious soon enough, and it seems that this at least will get everybody off each other's backs for a while.
EDIT: Also, let's dial down the vitriol in this thread a little. There's no point in getting outraged over something that'll resolve itself.
Re: Node.js is forked to Ayo.js (pronounced like “IO”)
#104Earlier quoted context omitted.
From an issue: > I'd be open to re-merging if and when the problems plaguing Node.js are resolved. Problematic people removed; use of "policy" as an excuse ended; power structures reorganized to emphasize community over tech. So far though it seems like there's little desire to fix these problems from those with the power to do so.
Silly node, emphasizing tech.
Re: Node.js is forked to Ayo.js (pronounced like “IO”)
#105The more I code, the more I appreciate projects and languages that are not based on a democratic committee and have a consistent unique single minded vision. I'd rather stick to a language/framework that aligns with my own preferences, than stick to one that tries to please to a large group of people. I feel this is the major problem with Javascript, Node, etc.
People using node.js and not wanting this kind of bullshit should go on github and open an issue to remove the CoC. I would back it up for sure.
I'm criticising design by committee.
Re: Node.js is forked to Ayo.js (pronounced like “IO”)
#106Would you rather use good code by a shitty person or shitty code by a good person?
Re: Node.js is forked to Ayo.js (pronounced like “IO”)
#107Brace yourself. SJWs are coming after software projects this year.
I imagine microcontroller software development stays free of them too, largely because of the barrier to entry.
Re: Node.js is forked to Ayo.js (pronounced like “IO”)
#108Reasons for fork: "Repeated ToC violations by an authority figure went unaddressed." https://twitter.com/alicegoldfuss/status/900109726872068096 Not sure what ToC is, but the alleged violations appear to be of Code of Conduct. Alleged violations are described here: https://twitter.com/ohhoe/status/899748838302302212 Most links are private, but here are the public ones: https://twitter.com/rvagg/status/887652116524707…
I don't see anything wrong with the tweets. I don't think Rod is a bad person, he's been involved with Node.js for years. Try working on an open source project for 5 years and then we can talk about altruism.
I'm pretty sure that's exactly what the people forking Node here are trying to do, though perhaps not with a particular time limit.
Re: Node.js is forked to Ayo.js (pronounced like “IO”)
#109Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't see anything wrong with the tweets. I don't think Rod is a bad person, he's been involved with Node.js for years. Try working on an open source project for 5 years and then we can talk about altruism.
I don't think there's anything wrong with the tweets too. And it seems the Node Technical Steering Committee had similar thoughts, since they rejected the proposal of expelling Rod.
Re: Node.js is forked to Ayo.js (pronounced like “IO”)
#110Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is unclear. Seemed like he has repeatedly used a language that some community members found offensive. His stance against Code of Conduct, as evident by this Tweet: https://twitter.com/rvagg/status/887652116524707841 and follow up comments were considered inappropriate by some. Even more details here: https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/issues/310 """ The TSC members were not able to reach a natural consensus on the ste…
They had a vote to remove him, it failed. Move on!
If it's an open source software project, they are also free to fork the software and make their own project around it. While, obviously, two parallel projects divided by interpersonal issues isn't ideal and likely duplicates efforts, it's better than losing the work of either of the factions, so, given the existence of the social issues, it's quite possibly the best acheivable outcome.