Earlier quoted context omitted.
basically Chrome (I just saved you a click)
Although, their demo works perfectly fine in Firefox: https://corehacker-10883.firebaseapp.com/
[1] - https://www.webcomponents.org/polyfills#custom-elements-poly...
21–30 of 107 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
basically Chrome (I just saved you a click)
Although, their demo works perfectly fine in Firefox: https://corehacker-10883.firebaseapp.com/
[1] - https://www.webcomponents.org/polyfills#custom-elements-poly...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Great, that makes so much sense. But then, how about other dependencies that might come into play? For example, underscore, is that "packaged" with this generated JS file or some other way around? Thanks for the prompt response BTW.
No, Stencil.js is like a "real stencil", it is used to produce something, but it is not in the final product. There is nothing like "window.stencil" or any stencil related API in the output of the stencil compiler. It generates vanilla JS web components without dependencies. The documentation of stencil linked in this HN post was in fact created with stencil itself. Just open the Dev Tools!
Gosh, the content is illegible on Chrome and Windows 8. 14px and a lightweight font does not make for happy reading.
I have to squint to see the font, there's two headers with two different slogans and a paragraph consisting of 12 words that tell me to go to the docs without providing a link.
The rest of the landing page is white-space.
Come on. Woo the visitor. First impressions are everything, and this fails.
At the very least move 'What is Stencil?' to the landing page.
This could be amazing, whatever it is. But that's the problem. I have to squint to see the font, there's two headers with two different slogans and a paragraph consisting of 12 words that tell me to go to the docs without providing a link. The rest of the landing page is white-space. Come on. Woo the visitor. First impressions are everything, and this fails. At the very least move 'What is Stencil?' to the landing pa…
Gosh, the content is illegible on Chrome and Windows 8. 14px and a lightweight font does not make for happy reading.
It's more the OS than the font choice, different OSes render text better or worse. The site looks great on a 15 inch macbook pro.
Here's a new library to solve a problem you don't have yet.
Fixed that for you :)
Here's a new library to solve a problem you don't have yet.