Live data from Hacker News

Node.js is forked to Ayo.js (pronounced like “IO”)

github.com

41–50 of 150 posts

Re: Node.js is forked to Ayo.js (pronounced like “IO”)

#41

The previous fork was successful because a lot of the developers went with the fork and it was fulfilling an unserviced need in the community for a node built on newer versions of v8. Does anyone know if this fork has much of a chance of survival?

didn't follow the node development closely, what was this fork?

io.js

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Node.js#History

Re: Node.js is forked to Ayo.js (pronounced like “IO”)

#43

The previous fork was successful because a lot of the developers went with the fork and it was fulfilling an unserviced need in the community for a node built on newer versions of v8. Does anyone know if this fork has much of a chance of survival?

didn't follow the node development closely, what was this fork?

The previous fork was io.js, it's contributions have now been brought back under the Node.js umbrella. This new fork is almost a non-story by comparison, if it gets even a minor level of traction amongst developers I'll be surprised. Even the repo creator has half-arsed the readme.

Re: Node.js is forked to Ayo.js (pronounced like “IO”)

#44

The previous fork was successful because a lot of the developers went with the fork and it was fulfilling an unserviced need in the community for a node built on newer versions of v8. Does anyone know if this fork has much of a chance of survival?

This fork adds nothing, it's just a "politics" thing, I doubt it will survive past a few weeks

Re: Node.js is forked to Ayo.js (pronounced like “IO”)

#45
post #27

Line that stood out to me: "Rod retweeted in support of an inflammatory anti-Code-of-Conduct article" If you're not 100% onboard with the politics, you're a horrible person.

I can tell that this will be a productive and level-headed comment thread.

Re: Node.js is forked to Ayo.js (pronounced like “IO”)

#49
They're flipping out because of a tweet, and all it had was a link to an article against codes of conduct.

"Additionally he discussed private information from the moderation repo in the public thread, which is explicitly against he moderation policy".

I don't like such secrecy. What's going on in there? Wasn't community so important, why can't we know?

So what if that guy doesn't like CoCs? It is fine for people to have other opinions. This is another case of people over reacting over small stuff like it happened with Brendan Eich or Douglas Crockford.

Oh gee, some people need to chill out.

Post reply on HN