Live data from Hacker News

Google pays Apple $1B (or more)

techcrunch.com

21–27 of 27 posts

Re: Google pays Apple $1B (or more)

#21

It makes perfect sense when you remember that the reason Android exists is to get users into the Google ecosystem, as a loss leader. iOS exists to sell expensive handsets. I don’t think Google cares what phone you have as long as all of your valuable data is in Google services and you’re viewing Google ads.

Mostly true, but note that Android isn't a "loss leader" by any stretch, Google has made tens of billions on it: http://www.investors.com/news/technology/google-has-raked-in...

Re: Google pays Apple $1B (or more)

#23

Isn't it interesting that the fight is between Google and Apple, while the consumer is the one holding the product in hand. They did a extraordinary job of taking control over the final user. The user has the power ("ability" but let's exaggerate) to switch to any search engine they want, thwarting any decision these two companies make. But that's too complicated, let's leave it to the techies. I really wish for a ma…

> I really wish for a mandatory class in schools where students are demystified about computers.

I do too, but I don't see how it would make a difference in this situation.

I know plenty about computers and I choose to use Google search anyway, because I've tried the alternatives and they are nowhere near as good. I choose to use Apple products too, because I prefer them to the alternatives.

Re: Google pays Apple $1B (or more)

#24

Isn't it interesting that the fight is between Google and Apple, while the consumer is the one holding the product in hand. They did a extraordinary job of taking control over the final user. The user has the power ("ability" but let's exaggerate) to switch to any search engine they want, thwarting any decision these two companies make. But that's too complicated, let's leave it to the techies. I really wish for a ma…

> I really wish for a mandatory class in schools where students are demystified about computers. I do too, but I don't see how it would make a difference in this situation. I know plenty about computers and I choose to use Google search anyway, because I've tried the alternatives and they are nowhere near as good. I choose to use Apple products too, because I prefer them to the alternatives.

Yes, and with your powers you choose google. If apple was to switch your default, you will silently go to settings and restore it to google search. Now imagine not even knowing there is a choice to be made.

Re: Google pays Apple $1B (or more)

#25
post #3

I've been trying to run Adwords Universal Campaign on my iOS app, but Google just wouldn't drive any traffic to my iOS app while similar Android campaign works like a charm. Is Google trying to undermine Apple via its Search/Adwords monopoly here?

Could you be bit more elaborate about your objective? Is it get your iOS app installs via Ads. More impressions/clicks on the ads, gets more money for Google, I don't see a reason for them to restrict that in any ways; in-fact the whole article is about it's importance.

[deleted]

Re: Google pays Apple $1B (or more)

#26
post #3

I've been trying to run Adwords Universal Campaign on my iOS app, but Google just wouldn't drive any traffic to my iOS app while similar Android campaign works like a charm. Is Google trying to undermine Apple via its Search/Adwords monopoly here?

Could you be bit more elaborate about your objective? Is it get your iOS app installs via Ads. More impressions/clicks on the ads, gets more money for Google, I don't see a reason for them to restrict that in any ways; in-fact the whole article is about it's importance.

Yes trying to get more installs for my apps but Adwords just wont run my iOS campaign while Android runs very well. This has nothing to do with Google controlling Play Store because when i see the placement source it is driving traffic mostly from youtube.com.

Re: Google pays Apple $1B (or more)

#27
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Apple wouldn't want to have to offer a subpar default search offering to their users That's what people thought about maps, too.

I've actually switched, after a long time, to using Apple Maps as my default mapping application. It's good enough for 99.9% of the time. And I like its privacy-conscious construction.

I drive a lot of car KM's in Europe. Apple Maps is bad when it comes to guiding me over the best (read: moving traffic) roads compared to Google Maps. As much as I enjoy particular instructions (specifically the indication of highway splits) from Apple Maps, Google Maps just keeps me moving and prevents stalls way better over here. Short distances it matters less. That might be your 99.9%?
Post reply on HN