The Strange Disappearance of Cooperation in America (2013)

Post by johnny22 » Sun, Aug 20, 2017, 11:31 PM UTC

coop-throwaway wrote: post #32

RickS wrote: post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's a lot to unpack in that comment, and I'm not going to take a swing at much of it, except to say that you should be careful of confusing visibility with reality. Both the haves and the have nots are equipped with increasingly large megaphones (instagram, et al). Most people are regular, and guys have been "taking" other guy's girls since we were beating each other with sticks. The idea that this phenomenon is…

Never before could a woman open an app and literally have hundreds of men at her door within minutes (all while men struggle to get a single match). This has created such an imbalance that the women are able to reject roughly the bottom 80% of men leaving most men struggling to get the attention of the bottom 20% of women. And yes, there are lots of men with shortcomings, physical ones, that have rendered them out of…

Post by bitL » Sun, Aug 20, 2017, 11:42 PM UTC

RickS wrote: post #39

coop-throwaway wrote: post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Never before could a woman open an app and literally have hundreds of men at her door within minutes (all while men struggle to get a single match). This has created such an imbalance that the women are able to reject roughly the bottom 80% of men leaving most men struggling to get the attention of the bottom 20% of women. And yes, there are lots of men with shortcomings, physical ones, that have rendered them out of…

I'm going to venture a guess that you spend a lot of time on r/incels. I'm going to further guess that you're using a throwaway because somewhere in your mind, you realize that what you're saying is cranky, entitled, and doesn't hold water. I won't reply after this. Sorry you feel cheated by the world.

Post by coop-throwaway » Sun, Aug 20, 2017, 11:48 PM UTC

RickS wrote: post #39

coop-throwaway wrote: post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Never before could a woman open an app and literally have hundreds of men at her door within minutes (all while men struggle to get a single match). This has created such an imbalance that the women are able to reject roughly the bottom 80% of men leaving most men struggling to get the attention of the bottom 20% of women. And yes, there are lots of men with shortcomings, physical ones, that have rendered them out of…

I'm going to venture a guess that you spend a lot of time on r/incels. I'm going to further guess that you're using a throwaway because somewhere in your mind, you realize that what you're saying is cranky, entitled, and doesn't hold water. I won't reply after this. Sorry you feel cheated by the world.

Post by mannigfaltig » Mon, Aug 21, 2017, 12:03 AM UTC

coop-throwaway wrote: post #32

RickS wrote: post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's a lot to unpack in that comment, and I'm not going to take a swing at much of it, except to say that you should be careful of confusing visibility with reality. Both the haves and the have nots are equipped with increasingly large megaphones (instagram, et al). Most people are regular, and guys have been "taking" other guy's girls since we were beating each other with sticks. The idea that this phenomenon is…

Never before could a woman open an app and literally have hundreds of men at her door within minutes (all while men struggle to get a single match). This has created such an imbalance that the women are able to reject roughly the bottom 80% of men leaving most men struggling to get the attention of the bottom 20% of women. And yes, there are lots of men with shortcomings, physical ones, that have rendered them out of…

Post by georgeoliver » Mon, Aug 21, 2017, 12:13 AM UTC