71–76 of 76 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Don't you have to pay for that?
One click away: https://aws.amazon.com/macie/pricing/ "No charge for the first 1 GB processed by the content classification engine After first GB, $5 per GB processed by the content classification engine"
...data that's already on their servers, to boot!
Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is a false and defamatory. I (Chris Vickery) have never ransomed any data. I have protected the private data of hundreds of millions. Post some evidence or retract your comment.
I never said "you" (assuming it's really you, new account and all) ransomed the "data" specifically, but I do know of two instances where you threatened companies to go to their customers and/or the FTC unless they met your specific demands.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's worth noting that SSN is far worse than a credit card number. "Something you know" isn't a great standard as the entirety of auth, but it'll probably stay common for practical reasons. But "something you know and can never change if breached" is absolutely idiotic, and there are plenty of good alternatives already in existence.
"Improper use of this card and/or number by the number holder or any other person is punishable by fine, imprisonment or both." We could start by exacting real consequences for those who abuse SSNs.
So, enforcement is a lot easier said than done.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I can tell you that campaigns have much of this information already, often provided directly by the state as public information. The idea that campaigns don't already "create Custom Audiences based on voting history and district" is laughable at best. Communications are often targeted in exactly this way. Here's Florida's relevant information: http://dos.myflorida.com/elections/for-voters/voter-registra... "Voter reg…
Most of this info is public, but not who you voted for, or your email address.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is a false and defamatory. I (Chris Vickery) have never ransomed any data. I have protected the private data of hundreds of millions. Post some evidence or retract your comment.
I never said "you" (assuming it's really you, new account and all) ransomed the "data" specifically, but I do know of two instances where you threatened companies to go to their customers and/or the FTC unless they met your specific demands.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
what alternative do you have in mind ?
Well, I haven't yet patented an alternative, but I think it's pretty clear that, in this climate of routine breaches, the old system of secret data is no longer viable. But, if you're interested in building an alternative, then off the top of my head, I'd suggest that we've got the blockchain. We've all got omnipresent palm-sized computing devices. We've got 2FA schemes, and more. The tools are there for you to creat…