Earlier quoted context omitted.
I tried changing my default web browser. Worked.
A drastic solution!
Ask HN: What's it like to work at Mozilla these days?
71–80 of 83 posts
Re: Ask HN: What's it like to work at Mozilla these days?
#72Earlier quoted context omitted.
Made it impossible to use add-ons like Tab Groups, making impossible to use the browser with many tabs open (just like Chrome, but you can't open many tabs in it anyway because it eats so much memory per tab).
IIRC, the author of Tab Groups threw their toys out of the pram when told the extension model was changing and that if they needed a feature, they should post on bugzilla. I don't know quite what's happened since then. EDIT: Looking at bugzilla, looks like the author of Tab Groups decided he was going to put together a report about a year ago, and then never did, so Mozilla doesn't even have any documentation of what…
Also, Mozilla knows perfectly well which functionality is needed to implement Tab Groups because it was an actual feature of a browser before they decided "it should be a plugin". And now it's impossible to even write a plugin for it.
Re: Ask HN: What's it like to work at Mozilla these days?
#73Earlier quoted context omitted.
IIRC, the author of Tab Groups threw their toys out of the pram when told the extension model was changing and that if they needed a feature, they should post on bugzilla. I don't know quite what's happened since then. EDIT: Looking at bugzilla, looks like the author of Tab Groups decided he was going to put together a report about a year ago, and then never did, so Mozilla doesn't even have any documentation of what…
It's not "throwing toys out of the pram" when add-on developers are forced to rewrite their entire code every damn year, and this time using an incredibly limited API from goddamn Google Chrome of all places. There are a plenty of bugs open in Bugzilla to implement necessary APIs so the old add-ons can work. The problem? Mozilla devs are closing them as WONTFIX because they're lazy and don't want to implement any mor…
Re: Ask HN: What's it like to work at Mozilla these days?
#74Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think there should also be a switch to make it faster.
Sure, sarcasm helps. I think he meant a few checkboxes, for choosing things like round corners etc. which should not be too hard. Really necessary? Maybe not, but you should realize, that you have a shrinking core group of users, while liked Firefox because they could modify it the way they wanted - and therefore did not liked it, when frequently changes broke their setup.
So does not particularly well thought out criticism.
There's also shrinking core group of users, who liked Firefox before it fell back on many areas, crippled by having to maintain compatibility with add-ons that relied on internal workings. We realize that very well.
Configurability comes with an exponential testing and maintenance burden. So no, it's not just adding a few checkboxes. It's what happens with those afterwards.
Re: Ask HN: What's it like to work at Mozilla these days?
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
IIRC, the author of Tab Groups threw their toys out of the pram when told the extension model was changing and that if they needed a feature, they should post on bugzilla. I don't know quite what's happened since then. EDIT: Looking at bugzilla, looks like the author of Tab Groups decided he was going to put together a report about a year ago, and then never did, so Mozilla doesn't even have any documentation of what…
It's not "throwing toys out of the pram" when add-on developers are forced to rewrite their entire code every damn year, and this time using an incredibly limited API from goddamn Google Chrome of all places. There are a plenty of bugs open in Bugzilla to implement necessary APIs so the old add-ons can work. The problem? Mozilla devs are closing them as WONTFIX because they're lazy and don't want to implement any mor…
It's one or the other.
Either the API gives very deep control, and it must evolve as the browser evolves, or it does not, and it can stay stable.
Experience says that Firefox was on the wrong side here by offering complete access, thereby either blocking the browser to evolve, or forcing add-on authors on a compatibility treadmill, effectively getting the worst of both worlds.
Maybe it's possible to do better. But we haven't managed to do so, and neither has our competition. So it's probably not easy.
Re: Ask HN: What's it like to work at Mozilla these days?
#76Earlier quoted context omitted.
giving Firefox users a browser that looks like, and feeling like Chrome. Yawn. What did we do this time? Make it faster? Follow platform guidelines or modernize the design style? Adopt an extension model that can be combined with replacing the browser internals? Use rounded tabs? No wait, scratch that, they're square again.
Made it impossible to use add-ons like Tab Groups, making impossible to use the browser with many tabs open (just like Chrome, but you can't open many tabs in it anyway because it eats so much memory per tab).
Re: Ask HN: What's it like to work at Mozilla these days?
#77Earlier quoted context omitted.
"... only available in particular countries which doesn't include your country, unfortunately..." was the message from HR.
That's true, we can't hire everywhere.
Re: Ask HN: What's it like to work at Mozilla these days?
#78I was a contributor 3 years ago and my experience with Mozilla was mixed. On the one hand, the people are skilled and super nice and I think you do good stuff when working there. On the other hand you work on big old software projects with all the tools that grew onto them over the years. So if you on the technical side of things, you better like maintenance work, hehe.
...and, yes there is a legacy problem with old code bases, but one trade-off for interns, contributors, junior developers is that you get to make an impact on a codebase used in a commercial project by hundreds of millions of people. Terrible tools written in anger in 2003 are still in use, sure, and terrible architectural decisions have been made, re-made, then made again over the years. It's the kind of messy any c…
lolwat?
Re: Ask HN: What's it like to work at Mozilla these days?
#79Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think there should also be a switch to make it faster.
Sure, sarcasm helps. I think he meant a few checkboxes, for choosing things like round corners etc. which should not be too hard. Really necessary? Maybe not, but you should realize, that you have a shrinking core group of users, while liked Firefox because they could modify it the way they wanted - and therefore did not liked it, when frequently changes broke their setup.
Which is unfortunately an inherent problem with our legacy customization approach.
And it is clearly not something the vast majority of users want, if they left Firefox for another browser that appears to them less customizable but more stable. We have run numerous user studies about what users actually care for and they have all informed what Firefox is going to be in the future.
Re: Ask HN: What's it like to work at Mozilla these days?
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
...and, yes there is a legacy problem with old code bases, but one trade-off for interns, contributors, junior developers is that you get to make an impact on a codebase used in a commercial project by hundreds of millions of people. Terrible tools written in anger in 2003 are still in use, sure, and terrible architectural decisions have been made, re-made, then made again over the years. It's the kind of messy any c…
> Terrible tools written in anger in 2003 lolwat?